December 19, 2002  

The Hours
(Paramount/Miramax) Rated PG-13
Release Date: December 27, 2002


 

Starring: Meryl Streep, Julianne Moore, Nicole Kidman,
Ed Harris, Toni Collette
Directed by: Stephen Daldry
Produced by: Scott Rudin, Robert Fox
Written by: David Hare

 

The Hours Is From Venus…

I first saw The Hours more than a month ago.  I had some strong feelings about what the movie was and what the movie was not.  But I knew that I had to see the movie at least one more time before I would be ready to write about it.  I saw it again yesterday.  And it was a very different experience. 

For a month, I’ve simplified the experience of this film… story structure was off… there wasn’t enough for Meryl Streep and Julianne Moore to do… the supporting characters were more interesting than the leads… etc. etc. etc.

But somehow, after taking so long to see the film again, I really relaxed into the experience the second time around.  Part of it was the lack of pressure, now that I have seen all the films there are to see and a quiet week is just around the corner.  But a bigger part of the change, I think, was that I knew what was coming.  And in The Hours, that makes a huge difference.  There is a third act twist that, for me, is key to the entire experience of this film.  And it changed how I viewed the first 90 minutes or so… a lot.

While I was relaxing, I lingered more freely in the performances of Streep and Ed Harris and Julianne Moore.  Kidman’s turn as Virginia Woolf is perhaps the most underappreciated great turn this year, with far too many critics and civilians leading with comments about her putty nose.  This performance is much, much more than that.

As I was watching this time around, it occurred to me that I was watching a “women’s movie” in the most literal of ways.  Besides being about women, it is a film of moments… moments that do not always lead to an easily defined climax.  If you were to take each of these moments as little stories in their own right, this movie has a great deal to offer.  And I started to think, this is what the film is about…. it’s about living at a pace that can only make sense to you, your own personal emotional music, your own indescribable pain, your own odd form of expression.  Surviving the hours between key events…. living… it’s not always easy… it’s harder for the emotionally open, no matter how strong the façade.

And then it hit me…. the theme of the year is this small step of survival.  People are making movies about making the small steps, instead of the classic, showy, big Hollywood leaps.  Adaptation, Far From Heaven and About Schmidt are all baby-step movies.  So are 8 Mile, Max, Narc, Roger Dodger and Secretary.  They are all about real people trying to adapt, taking small steps in the right direction.  No epiphanies, not revelations… reality… the way we really evolve in life… usually.  That’s not to say that the bigger emotional sweep of Antwone Fisher and The Pianist aren’t every bit as valid.  It is the emotional size of these two films that keeps me believing so strongly in their Oscar chances.  Even Gangs of New York, epic that it is, is really a small step movie.  Its bookends are the rise and fall of one powerful man and his personal philosophy of what America is and what it should be.

In The Hours, the small steps of these three women are reflective of one another, despite leagues of time between each story.  How do we fill the hours of our lives?  Do we run, so we lie, do we die?  Each woman has to take that journey themselves.  And so do the people in their lives. 

Is indulging our individual truths a form of excessive narcissism?  Or do the people who love us, love us in a way that is as important to them as their own journeys? 

Meryl Streep is breathtaking.  Seeing this again, reflected in the glory of Adaptation, reminded me of what a treasure this actress is to the dramatic form.  Her skin breathes truth.  Her hair caresses the air.  Her eyes speak louder than any screenplay’s words. 

Julianne Moore also walks this dramatic tightrope with seeming effortlessness.  But there is an odd reflection of Far From Heaven in this role.  She is so reactive here.  Her best scene comes when she is given a great acting backboard… a remarkable turn by Toni Collette.  It is odd, as Collette seems to be channeling a variation on Moore’s Far From Heaven character, but one who is, when she wants to be, wide awake. 

As great as the trio of actresses is, it is the supporting performances that really shine here.  Alison Janney, Claire Danes and John C., Reilly are great.  But Stephen Dillane, Miranda Richardson, Ed Harris and Collette are each worth the price of admission all by themselves. 

And yet… I still didn’t get everything out of The Hours that I hoped to get, even in the second screening.  What is this movie really asking us?  I’m still not quite sure.  And maybe that’s what some people really love about this film.  There is one central connective relationship that goes unexplored, outside of lovely platitudes.  And that really bothered me.  That was the relationship I most wanted to explore.  But alas, no.

Some have called this a “gay agenda movie.”  I still am trying to figure out just what agenda there is in the film.  It’s not about gayness over being gay.  It never blames the misery on being gay.  Though the facts are out on the table, there isn’t a real back-and-forth about what it all means.  The only agenda I see is to make a difficult story come to life on the big screen, to mixed results.  All there really is are the seconds… the moments… the minutes…

 

©2002 The Hot Button.com
All Rights Reserved.