WEEKEND
PREVIEW
The question for this
weekend is not whether The Truman Show will be No. 1. It's how
high the moon? (In this case a simulated one.) Based on a high-interest
level, good word-of-mouth and a massive (if somewhat inaccurate) ad campaign,
plus some guy name Carrey, I'm guessing that the film will do between
35 and 40 million bucks this weekend. In the second spot, not the lizard,
but the lizard-skinned Michael Douglas (OK, it's a cheap shot,
but Mike and Gwyneth makes me almost as queasy as Ben and Gwyneth) in
A Perfect Murder. The buzz is all over the place on this Hitchcock
remake from The Fugitive director Andy Davis. First it was
up, then Warner Bros. couldn't make up its mind about the June 5 release
date, then some bad reviews, then some good ones. But as we all know,
it doesn't much matter whether the film is good in the first weekend.
It's the hype, and Douglas traditionally earns his keep on first weekends,
no matter what the film. Eighteen million for second place.
In third, I was
expecting to predict that Hope Floats would rise above Godzilla
this weekend, but I've changed my mind. Hope was ahead of The Liz (soon
to be a Broadway musical starring Michael Jackson as Godzilla)
all week, but not by much. I think kids will still be checking out Godzilla
this weekend, and last week's 59 percent fall-off will become just 35
percent for around $12 million this weekend. Hope Floats should
have a similar drop and fall to fourth with about a $9.2 million take.
(A $9 million take? Sounds like an Armageddon price tag.) And
what would the top five be if Deep Impact wasn't here? People
really like this film and I just don't get it. I wish there was something
about it that I did like. Oh, well. Throw another $6.5 million in the
way of the asteroid.
The second 10 should
be pretty contentious this week. The only newcomer should be Dirty
Work, which should manage about $2.5 million, even with crappy reviews,
crappy reaction to the trailer and no stars, which has led to a crappy
abuse of Chris Farley's cameo, in desperation. (The Almost
Heroes/Dirty Work double feature could be right next to "drug
overdose" in the "cause of death" section on Farley's autopsy report.)
In sixth, The Horse Whisperer should take another $4.8 million
in its march to be this year's official Bridges of Madison County,
though it will have to scrape to match Madison's $71 million domestic
take. Bulworth should come in right ahead of Dirty Work
(about $2.9 million for seventh) and I Got the Hook Up should
come in right behind it (about $2.4 million for eighth). In the rest
of this ugly little gathering, Almost Heroes and Quest for
Camelot will try to hold up while Titanic might float back
up a little. All three films should be somewhere between $1 and $2 million.
JUST
WONDERING:
Titanic is amazing and all, but why isn't Paramount pulling it
for a September re-release? They could make more money from the film
in a couple of fall weekends than they'll make from letting The Boat
linger at $1.5 million a week all summer. Video killed the distribution
executive star.
THE
GOOD:
The Truman Show is pretty damned good. For better or worse, it
left me wanting more. (Warning: Shameless Truman-Show-like product placement
to follow.) If you are interested in what was missing and why, check
out my
feature. And there's a lot more Truman in this week's rough cut.
THE
BAD: Bad?
Well, when you have to open a major motion picture starring Michael
Douglas with a lead quote from Jeanne Wolf's Hollywood, it
sure looks like a slamming time. But I haven't seen the picture yet,
so I won't judge. (Snicker, snicker.)
THE
UGLY:
The Internet rumor mill has got people like A Perfect Murder
director Andy Davis buying into stories like Psycho being
remade shot-for-shot and word-for-word. Notice how the world isn't a
buzz with news that Brian Grazer broke his media silence to acknowledge
that the new Psycho is currently getting some minor rewrites.
I'm beginning to feel bad for the publicists. If they talk, they get
bombed (Godzilla) and if they stay silent, there will be backlash
when people find out the pundits had it wrong (potentially Psycho).
THE
CONTEST:
Check out the new weekly box office contest. It's fun, it's easy (especially
this week) and the prizes (soundtrack CDs) are swell! But make sure
to start playing now because the new contest has monthly winners. Miss
a week and you may not be able to catch up. And don't forget my contest,
which runs all summer long. You have $100 in your pocket and all June
to bet before you lose it, but take a look now. The odds are about to
change.
TWO
MOVIES EQUAL:
The Last Days of Disco + A Perfect Murder = The Last Days
of Murder. The fourth film of Whit Stillman's delightful trilogy,
The Last Days of Murder follows white Anglo-Saxon Protestants Chip,
Mac, Theodore and the exotic Courtney (she moved to Brooklyn at 20)
as they sit in really expensive living rooms and talk about their lives
as hitpeople. The group piles up 27 kills during the film, but we see
none of the action. Only the chat about how blood stains white polo
shirts.
BAD
AD WATCH:
San Diego Union Tribune reviewer David Elliott says of
Almost Heroes, "This is one of the year's funniest goofs." Is
that a good thing or a bad thing? Is he talking about the movie or Warner
Bros. choice to release it? Or perhaps he was talking about quality
actors and the brilliant Chris Guest's choice to take on the project,
which came from some otherwise-talented Chicago improv guys?
READER
OF THE DAY:
From Rori: "With all the fuss over a certain lizard not doing boffo
business, I have to bring up what would seem to me to be a greater failure
-- Quest for Camelot. Is it true that it cost Warner Bros. over
$140 million? (I assume the building of original facilities for production
was factored in.) Nothing I saw in that film suggested such expense.
It was even poorly edited -- and with storyboards worked through on
animated films. That is inexcusable. I read a lot about production troubles,
what the hell REALLY went wrong with it? Why did Warner Bros. do such
a poorly thought-out tale in the first place?"
E
ME:
Rhetorical questions, all, I suppose. But a good letter. But this is what
I want to know from you all. If you were a studio publicist, how would
you handle Internet rumors? Especially when they turn up in Entertainment
Weekly? You are all serious about movies or you wouldn't have surfed
over here. Do you want to know every nook and cranny about a movie months
before it hits? Is all this talk ruining the magic?