SAVING
PRIVATE PREMIERES:
Frankly, I hate to be writing this story. I like the publicity department
at DreamWorks; I am deeply enamored of the company's unique way of separating
quality filmmaking from the pure hype that has become so much a part
of getting an audience, and I look forward to working with them in the
future. But they screwed up this time. First, Newsweek backdoored
them by releasing their Saving Private Ryan cover story two weeks
ahead of time, which is kind of a pun because the problem with the timing
was that it precluded a Time magazine cover story. One can't
really blame DreamWorks for that, though you don't often see magazines
risking the wrath of the more-established studios.
Then, Tuesday night,
the Saving Private Ryan premiere hit the beach without "Entertainment
Tonight." Why? Because DreamWorks had given the "No. 1" camera spot
to "Access Hollywood," presumably in a deal that came along with special
"Access Hollywood" coverage of the event. Or, perhaps someone was unhappy
with E.T. and wanted to put them in their place. Regardless of why,
this had to be a conscious choice by Terry Press and Co. made long before
the event took place.
I'm sure it never
occurred to the studio that E.T. would actually skip the event in a
fit of pique. Especially since it's a Paramount movie. And also because
TV viewers would have no way of knowing who had the "No. 1" spot and
who got the No. 2. But skip it, E.T. did ("respect must be paid") and
DreamWorks (who really doesn't need any more hype for this sure-bet
double-digit Oscar-nominee film) lost a day of free promo from the highest
rated of the entertainment "news" shows.
NEW
LOSS:
I feel that I should disclose that roughcut.com did not boycott
the premiere. We weren't invited because DreamWorks made an exclusive
deal with a competing Internet site. The truth is that the other site
would have covered the event in the exact same way had they not had
an exclusive (though I am sure they claimed otherwise, and I'm sure
we will do the same when we try to get an exclusive from DreamWorks
or another studio in the future). We on the Net, like the TV shows,
will go after whatever story (or premiere) will get us the most viewers.
The old image of the Internet as a free-for-all that rewarded content
over corporation has begun to devolve into being just another form of
media.
Fortunately for
me, roughcut.com is here, because The Hot Button would be subject
to daily censoring at any of the other major entertainment websites.
Here, they let me tell the truth. At least, the truth as I see it. (And
for the record, even as a member of the Time Warner family, roughcut.com
has some very idealistic folks at TNT to thank for our ongoing existence,
not the corporate superstructure. I know that it's very hard for Netizens
to see us as an underdog site given that we are a product of the biggest
cable network in the world, but that's what we are. And we try harder.)
SPRING
FORWARD, MOVE BACK:
Try to come up with the worst idea for a feature film ever. Then go
lower. The Jerry Springer Movie is for real. It's happening.
They have a multi-million dollar play-or-pay deal with Spinger, and
now they've hired a director. This reminds me of The Gong Show Movie,
which ended up as a maudlin and stupid effort indeed. Also, none too
successful, though it did give a feature credit to Jaye P. Morgan
and Gary Mule Deer. The video may end up selling, depending on
how ugly this movie gets, but as a feature, I think we should all take
the Donnie Brasco position. Fugeddaboudit.
SUPERSTAR
ANONYMOUS:
Another interesting film idea is Detox, which Sylvester Stallone
just signed up for as picture two of his three-picture deal at Universal.
It's a story about a cop who lands in 12-step (For violence-based trauma.
Heaven forbid Stallone play drunk and not be able to stop slurring after
recovery). and ends up seeing his fellow aspirants-to-mental-health
dying in not-so anonymous ways. I'm guessing they die in ways related
to the 12 steps. That way, when they hit a marketing glitch, they can
change the title to Twelve and add some sepia-tone and scary music to
the trailer. It's Stallone's first film since CopLand, so just
like Arnold Schwarzennegger, one of the world's "most bankable
actors" will end up with a two-year hiatus between films. Who was it
that said, "The times, they are a changing," Bob or Jakob
Dylan?
SPIN
WATCH:
In a lovely piece of spin, Variety is now towing Universal's
line that Stallone only got $17.5 million for the first (Daylight)
of his commitment to three. Unfortunately, this is after Stallone's
$20 million per film in the multi-picture deal, which was one of the
first things his former agent Ron Meyer did after becoming a
top honcho at the U, has become the longest-talked-about salary figure
in the last three years. The question here is who is spinning and why.
Do "they" think the $2.5 million differential will make people feel
that Universal has become a more responsible company? Or is someone
putting Sly in his place?
READERS
OF THE DAY:
From Rich B.: "I want to see BASEketball simply because the previews
are hilarious, and if they can approach that for an hour-and-a-half,
it should be great. On the other hand, the preview for MAFIA!
doesn't impress me at all, and if I hear that little girl screech 'Run,
florist, run' one more time I might do something disturbingly violent
-- but not in a cartoonish ZAZ way."
From Randal N.:
"MAFIA! will win hands down!! MAFIA!"
E
ME:
Is coverage of the entertainment business getting better or worse here
on the Internet? What do you get too much of and what do you get too little
of?