WEEKEND
PREVIEW
There is only one
real question this weekend: Will Rush Hour hold onto 50 percent
of its gross, 35 percent of its gross or 20 percent of its gross? In
other words, is it Knock Off, Blade or There's Something
About Mary? That's a question not only of percentage, but about
how the film drew $33 million worth of customers last weekend. This
weekend's drop-off should offer some insight. Me, I'm estimating a 30
percent loss for the film for another easy win with $23.1 million.
Ronin will
be up there, though I'm pretty sure MGM/UA's cluttered, mysterious ad
campaign will slow the film down. Fourteen million. By the way, despite
last weekend's massive rush to the Chris and Jackie Show (A well-executed
version of one of Hollywood's worst habits -- "Let's make 48 Hrs.
with karate!" We will suffer more crap because of this film's success.),
$14 million is a good opening for September. And $9 million is generous
for Urban Legend, but that's what I think it will manage. Thanks
to the inability of the film to stay on point, the ad campaign can't
either. What was clearly a great idea for a horror movie is a dud. And
if you don't believe me, I'll just paraphrase the film's tag line: "What
you don't believe can bore you to death."
Whew! I Got past
the first three films, but my enthusiasm for moving on brings me to
the unfortunate quick demise of One True Thing. I expect a 35
percent fall for the Carl Franklin drama to fourth place and
$4.29 million. I also expect the film to be one of those beloved-on-video
retro hits when women don't have to fight with their male companions
to see the film. (More below.) That should bring There's Something
About Mary's habit (via Fox) of overestimating Sunday only to come
back to a still-wonderful place on Earth Monday into clear focus. Why?
Because the film will likely report a 13 percent fall on Sunday, taking
fourth place with $4.9 million. But on Monday, the film should fall
into a virtual tie with One True Thing with a final figure that's
23 percent off or $4.34 million. Keep an eye out.
As I was reminded
in last week's reader's poll, not too many of us care what's happening
with old, worn-out movies in the second half of the Top 10. That's probably
more true when we have films under $1 million on the list, but it's
also a sign that the information revolution has turned new news to old
news quicker than ever. In any case, I'll be brief. I can't imagine
that Rounders, which dropped a huge 44 percent last weekend,
can fall as hard this week. A 35 percent fall to $3.1 million would
leave Rounders in sixth. Just behind, there's Matt Damon
again in Saving Private Ryan (seventh place with a 25 percent
drop to $2.6 million). And in eighth, yet another hero, Simon Birch,
able to hold his breath, but unable to add more screens this weekend,
should fall about 35 percent to $2.4 million. Blade should put
the bite on another $2 million with a 40 percent drop, and Ever After
should take 10th (25 percent off to $1.4 million). And, of course, everyone's
Hot Button fave, Armageddon, will fall 22 percent (off from last
weekend's 21 percent because that will represent "plausible erosion")
to $978,000 as it chugs past the $197 million mark. All A-bored!
THE
GOOD:
Jim Carrey's neck injury, which I was pretty sure was a stunt
the minute I heard about it (THB 9/24),
had my phone ringing yesterday. People who have worked with Carrey in
the past all thought it was a publicity stunt, too. And when I explained
that I thought it might just be part of staying-in-character, it was
explained to me by at least one former Carrey-ite that it is much more
Jim's style to create a deliberate event rather than being lost in his
world of acting. What's good about all that? For me, it's that no one
is buying the act. For Carrey, it means more press about the press buying
the stunt. Is everybody happy?!
THE
BAD: If
Universal and Carl Franklin are trying to figure out what went
wrong with One True Thing, allow me to offer this. There is no
doubt that movies on death are a hard sell (that is, unless the death
is quick and bloody), but given the very movie-worthy material that
they were working with, I had one strong objection to the film itself,
and I think Universal almost acknowledged it as a marketing problem
with their ad campaign. The son, played by Thomas Everett Scott,
essentially disappears from the film after his mother gets sick. He
appears in print ads, trailers and TV spots, but without impact because
he has little impact on the film.
Carl Franklin
reasonably explained that it was Renee Zellweger's character's
journey and that the father's unwillingness to risk his son's future
by bringing him home from college was part of the drama. Fine. But the
son was so separate from his mother's death by physical distance and
the father so separate by emotional distance that there wasn't much
for male viewers to latch onto. And that was apparent in all the trailers
and TV ads, even though it was by omission. I think the story of One
Tue Thing is of critical importance. Twenty and thirtysomethings
finding themselves who have to stop obsessing themselves and start contributing
to their families is not just an old-fashioned notion anymore. It's
become quite real as the sick are living longer and the insurance companies
are doing less. It's hard to live through and it's hard to watch, but
it's not just a woman's story anymore either.
THE
UGLY:
One reviewer I spoke to after a Ronin screening said to me: "By
the end, I think I understood what Ronin meant." If you think
that's a bad sign for the movie, try selling a movie that has that kind
of ambiguity.
JUST
WONDERING:
Can John Waters ever again reach the height of the grotesque
(Pink Flamingos' legendary scene of excrement cuisine), the absurd
(Edie, the Egg Lady) or the sublime (Hairspray)? I hope so. But
this weekend his return comes in the form of the small Pecker,
due in only about 200 theaters. It's a funny movie, but after the Farrelly
brothers raised the bar with their summer opus, one has to restrain
expectations for Waters' intimate, low-key comedy. Or it could be that
the Farrellys will help break Waters' out of his lonely cubbyhole and
allow him to fashion an art house career as the whacked Ed Burns.
BAD
AD WATCH:
Urban Legend offers "A heart-pounding, edge-of-your-seat treat!"
from Linda Sutter of the precisely named Entertainment Time-Out.
The reason viewer's hearts will pound is because they paid good money
to see this film (which doesn't explain Linda's heart troubles), and
you will be on the edge of your seat, anxiously hoping that something
good will happen before you absolutely have to go ask for your money
back. Urban Legend is, indeed, an entertainment time-out.
READER
OF THE DAY:
AJ wrote: "I haven't written you in a while, but since the topic du
jour is T&A, I must throw my two cents in. For what it's worth (two
cents, I guess), when it comes to major stars or movies, they should
leave it to the imagination. I just think it's better that way. Leave
the skin for B-movies, which are often nude shots with the thinnest
thread of a plot to tie them together (Of course, that's how those movies
should be, and if I ever write one, that's how it will be!) Anyway,
take Kate Winslet for example. All I know about her new movie
is that she's been exercising for the nude scene. Kate, you're a goddess.
Keep your clothes on, and let us mere mortals dream about what you're
hiding, or at least watch those few minutes of that 3-hour and 17-minute
movie over and over!"
And alternately,
Will wrote: "I don't know about the rest of the male American public,
but I was very upset not to see Cameron Diaz in the buff in There's
Something About Mary. And I've gotta agree with you on Heather
Graham, though not Katie Holmes. (She was my No. 1 until
Cameron came along.)"
E
ME: Did you skip One True Thing? Why? And are you going to
see Rush Hour a second time?