As I thought about my day today,
the true theme of this year's festival suddenly hit me. This is the
real Year of the Woman. Like so many real phenomena, it has occurred
without intent of fanfare. While there are great performances by men
in many films and many male directors did exceptional work, most of
my memories of greatness from this fest involve women. The mother and
two daughters of Hideous
Kinky, the eyes of first-time actress Lara
Belmonte and the pregnancy-stretched body of Tilda
Swinton in The
War Zone, Patricia
Neal and Glenn
Close leading Cookie's
Fortune, Edie
Falco's turn in Judy
Berlin, Susan
Traylor's transcendent embodiment of Valerie
Flake, the daring Sacha
Horler in Praise,
Run Lola Run and
Heather Donahue
in The Blair Witch Project.
And I haven't even seen the female-dominated The
24-Hour Woman, Sugar
Town, Santitos,
The Passion of Ayn Rand
or Splendor yet.
Geez, there are even two films about porn actresses that are amongst
the highest profile films of Sundance and Slamdance.
Today kind of cemented the
thought, as I caught a screening of Guinevere and a live chat
with two of the stars of Jawbreaker. Whether she likes it or
not, Sarah Polley is the story of this festival. And forget
the Parker Posey comparison. Sarah Polley is going to
be, if she chooses to be, a bigger star than Winona Ryder,
Claire Danes or any of the other teen-launched actresses out
there. Polley has a gift of on-screen intelligence that is so great
that it overwhelms her beauty. (That was Winona's promise in Heathers,
but her career has proven the opposite -- her beauty is more important
than her mind on screen.) If she has a limitation, it may be that
she won't ever make a good on-screen victim, a role that has become
a specialty of Ryder and Danes. Even when being victimized, Polley
is always the sharpest one on the screen. She makes choices whether
they are scripted or not. You can read it in her eyes. In both Guinevere
and Go, two very different roles, Polley will outgross every
film starring Gwyneth Paltrow (other than Shakespeare in
Love) combined. And people will be thrilled to take the trip.
There have been some great debuts by actresses in the last few years,
but this one-two punch puts Polley, without the benefit of gimmick,
amongst the leading actresses working today. And from Guinevere,
add to my estrogen-laden theorem a great performance by Jean Smart
that may finally break her free of "Designing Women."
As for the duo of Gayheart
and McGowan, maybe you'll think it was the sheer folly of having two
of Hollywood's sexiest young actresses sitting on my bed that makes
me write this, but this was the most enjoyable chat I have ever done.
And it wasn't the looks of the pair, but the way they invested in
the chat. They jumped right in, by my side, looking through questions,
making jokes on and off the record. (Much like Tim Roth did
Tuesday night.) Both women were remarkably sharp and funny and truthful.
And yes, they are an eyeful. This was a chat that I worried would
go wrong, but it went really right. Rose showed up fresh from the
chiropractor, but barely complained. Rebecca was game to take on any
question. A live chat is a weird process, but I didn't have to explain
it once. They got it from the start and charmed their way from start
to finish. And both give me hope for young Hollywood. I still wish
Gayheart hadn't allowed Jamie Blanks to photograph her so harshly
in Urban Legend, but while that was coming out, this actress,
dogged by the "former model" tag, was doing some serious stage work
in Last Night in Ballyhoo. Also, I'm not sure she knows how
funny she really is. I guarantee you that she is smarter and quicker
than most directors and writers she has worked with. And she seems,
even in person, fearless. I don't know what her future is, but I'm
sure that she will define it more than it defines her.
But enough of the love fest.
Publicists, talent and journalists
alike are far more prone to emotional outbursts (both happy and sad)
today than they were a week ago -- back when we all were only a little
insane. I feel as though I am establishing the tone of relationships
that will last for many years, for better and for worse. And that
is a feeling of great satisfaction, because it is human. And humanity
is not always a luxury we are allowed in the many camps that make
up Hollywood. Now onto today's movies.
On the Ropes: This
Hoop Dreams-styled documentary has been a big buzz flick here
in Park City. The word "great" has been liberally used. For me, it
made me appreciate Hoop Dreams all the more. What was so singular
about that film was that you really felt like you were spending years
with these families. On the Ropes does its best to give you
that feeling, but there is a lot of fudging on time and space. Also,
when one character gets involved with the penal system, the film doesn't
really face the possibility that one of the movie's heroes lied to
the filmmakers and the court. I'm not saying that she did and there's
no question that the portrait of criminal justice for the poor is
horrifying, but by not asking the question, the film left me wondering.
There was also some of this in other stories. Heroes are right and
the rest are the bad guys. But where was the gray.
Guinevere: You've
heard about Sarah Polley. A revelation. The movie itself is
probably the best Svengali story since Scorsese's segment of New
York Stories. Of course, Audrey Wells is no Scorsese, but
she does a nice job. The film moves along crisply, catches every emotion
and looks really good. Stephen Rea is no Nick Nolte,
but, then again, he isn't trying to be. He shows once again that he
is one of the greatest working actors alive in his portrayal of a
man who needs the company of young, emotionally hungry women. This
movie didn't hit a single wrong note on what can be a very delicate
subject. I look forward to a return trip.
La Ciudad: This is
more of the classical Sundance movie. It took six years to make and
is an American-made Spanish-language movie. It's the story of four
immigrants in joy and pain. There are no actors you would know, but
if you are willing to keep your eyes open, you will find the truth
of a world so many of us (and reading this on a computer tends to
qualify you for this status in and of itself) never get close enough
to see.
Trick: If you read
yesterday's column, you saw that one
of the ROTDs knows people in this film. I do believe that he isn't,
in fact, a publicist. (I was really kidding about that.) I saw the
movie tonight and it is a classic gay comedy. This is not a mainstream
film. Period. Exclamation point. That doesn't mean that it isn't good.
I just want to make it clear for you readers that this film is not
going to be released the same way a movie like Happy, Texas
(the big sale of the fest to date) is going to be released. (Both
are gay-themed, but my understanding is that Happy, Texas is
about as gay as Christopher Guest's Waiting for Guffman.)
Think Billy's Hollywood Screen Kiss. In many ways, this is
a better movie. The performances are strong and the production work
is solid. Tori Spelling is a hoot as a talentless, clueless
actress. Also, the fabulously topless Lorri Bagley probably
doesn't sound like Marilyn Monroe and has to be pretty smart
to play so dumb. I'll be keeping an eye out on that career. Overall,
the movie is funny and sweet, even when it isn't hitting the home
run.
Thick as Thieves:
Simply put, a dud. There's nothing wrong with the actors. There are
sporadic attempts at style, both visually and on the script. Basically,
it's a mediocre crime thriller with no real thrills, no great laughs
and no real reason to exist other than the fact that it got financing.
The only two highlights: Janeane Garofalo as a girlfriend of
Alec Baldwin (her first Baldwin!) and Michael Jai White
in a role that doesn't have him playing the freak. This guy deserves
to get acting roles like a regular actor. He's good-looking, well-built
and has a dramatically deep voice. Give it up. Also, let's try to
find some better roles for André Braugher. He is one
of the finest that the acting world has to offer, but only when challenged.
Except for one brief speech in this film, the role could have been
played by anyone.
Tomorrow, my day starts
with Sex at 8:00 a.m. It's capitalized because it's just a movie.
The Annabel Chong Story screens then and I'm sure that despite
the early hour, we'll be fighting for seats. Free food and porno,
the two most irresistible forces in the lives of writers. Right after
that, it's the much buzzed about Happy, Texas. After that,
Tumbleweeds. Then the Hitchcock documentary. That takes me
to about 6:00 p.m. Then, it's off to Lapdance. I'm not 100 percent
sure that we'll be able to have our chat from that event as I've hoped.
Check the listings at Yahoo! Chat as the day progresses. If it's still
there by 7:00 p.m. ET, it will happen. If not, not. But either way,
expect a lot of pictures and funny stories in tomorrow's column.
E
ME: Until
then, keep the cards and letters coming.