OSCAR®
WEEKEND SPECIAL
BEST
FASHION FAUX PAS:
E! inviting Joan Rivers to alternately abuse and drool over
stars on the red carpet. She has become the Jerry Springer
of the Academy Awards.
BEST
ELIA KAZAN STRATEGY:
The best strategy would be Kazan's, by turning down the award when
he gets it. There could be no better way to heal the wounds he has
created. Being that he can't fully heal them, it would bring some
honor back to the profession to show the insight and class that he
didn't show in front of the House Un-American Activities Committee.
READER
OF THE OSCARS 1:
From Miami Scott: "OK, David. Having no life here in Miami I have
to tell you that you are somewhat of a God to me... and your column
is the bible or kabbalah or whatever of the Westworld I wish I knew
better but, I have to know one thing -- You can't possibly think that
the always horrible Gwyneth Paltrow actually has a shot at
the title? Hell, if I slept with Brad at the beginning of my career,
I'd be huge now, too. Hmmm... Got his number? :) Cate Blanchett
is the only choice. A friend and I walked out of Shakespeare in
Love thinking we had seen the rehearsal version or something --
Horrible, horrible, horrible. Must have played well in the square
states. Your thoughts? Oh, and if Ian McKellan doesn't win,
there is no god, only monsters."
BEST
LAST MINUTE LAWSUIT:
On Thursday, romance novelist Faye Kellerman went public with
her lawsuit claiming that the concept for Shakespeare in Love
was taken from one of her books. The story was covered on the Internet
by Reuters/Variety.
BEST
COVER-UP OF A LAST MINUTE LAWSUIT:
By Friday afternoon, the story about Faye Kellerman's lawsuit
didn't exist on the Reuters/Variety news database. And the story never
turned up at all in the L.A. Times or The Hollywood Reporter.
Apparently, Harvey Weinstein's power to push his favorites
to the top of the heap is a bit more complex than the stupid, we-wish-we-had-a-story-so-we'll-
make-one-up "drama" of ad battles between Shakespeare in Love
and Saving Private Ryan. He can make news disappear completely!
STUPIDEST
OSCAR® CONTROVERSY:
Well, I just told you, didn't I? I've written about it before and
I'll write about it again. This whole thing about how much Miramax
spent on Shakespeare in Love's Oscar campaign is a complete
non-story. The only thing here that's new is that DreamWorks didn't
want to spend the money and was open about its grousing. The only
reason Saving Private Ryan isn't a clear favorite right now
is that it came out in the summer. That always offers too much time
for revisionist feelings about a film. If the Oscars were in August,
Shakespeare in Love would be in the same trouble, but worse.
I can hear it now: "It was cute and I love Little Gwynnie, but it
was only a comedy and it wasn't THAT good." But then again, if the
Oscars were in July, Weinstein would have opened SIL in May or June.
He's no dummy. On the other hand, if Saving Private Ryan were
a December release, it would be the sure bet winner and The Truman
Show would have gotten more nominations as the unofficial "summer
movie candidate." DreamWorks was hoping to have it both ways, with
Ryan and The Prince of Egypt as Best Picture nominees, much
like Miramax's SIL/Life is Beautiful tandem. But it didn't
work because POE just didn't fly. It wasn't enough of an underdog.
Maybe if they had called it Saving Pharaoh Moses, Weinstein would
be the one bitching about an unfair advantage.
BEST
CONFUSED NOMINEES:
Sir Ian McKellen should have been nominated for Apt Pupil,
not Gods and Monsters. Geoffrey Rush should have been
nominated for Elizabeth and not Shakespeare in Love.
Jane Horrocks should have been the actress nominated for Little
Voice, not the wonderful but not-outstanding-in-this Brenda
Blethyn. Shekhar Kapur should have gotten the Best Director
nod over the great Peter Weir, who was the one responsible
for both shooting The Truman Show brilliantly and then emasculating
it in the cutting room. Scott B. Smith should be nominated
for Best Original Novel, not Best Adapted Screenplay.
READER
OF THE OSCARS 2:
Jules: "OK, here's what to look for at the Oscars: Will Jack Nicholson
have a front row seat AGAIN? Will little Gwyneth thank her parents
first, her 'dear' friend Ben Affleck first or Harvey Weinstein
first? (I vote for Harvey. I mean he created her much more than her
parents.) Will any lighters go up when Aerosmith rocks (sarcasm
there) with 'I Don't Wanna...' whatever the pathetic song is called?
Who will bare the most cleavage? Or who will be baring more (a la
Ashley Judd, last year)? How many times will Roberto Benigni's
name be mispronounced? And will anyone actually become nauseous when
Celine Dion sings (I know I will at home)?"
BEST
ORIGINAL SONG ABOUT HOLLYWOOD:
"Celebrity Skin" by Hole. An easy winner, the song gets showbiz
better than any other in 1998. How about this sweet comment? "My name
is might have been. My name is never was. My name's forgotten." Or
this warm lyric? "You better watch out... what you wish for... it
better be worth it... so much to die for." The Hollywood job search
is dead on. "When I wake up in my makeup, have you ever felt so used
up as this? It's all so sugarless. Hooker/waitress/model/actress.
Oh, just go nameless." All of that, of course, leads to the ultimate
statement of the deeply jaded, "You want a part of me. Well, I'm not
selling cheap. No, I'm not selling cheap." As the old joke goes, we
know what you've become, now we're just negotiating price. Courtney
Love may be nuts, but she is much more the Hollywood icon than
Madonna has been. She admits the darkness of the city. And
her soul.
BEST
REASON TO TURN ON YOUR COMPUTER DURING THE SHOW:
Well, to talk back to me on Yahoo!
Chat, of course. Come by for the Oscarcast, live from the press
room, all night on Sunday. On Yahoo! Chat, from roughcut.com.
READER
OF THE OSCARS 3:
Mike from Austria: "Let me get right to my point: how can you even
DARE to say that Shakespeare in Love isn't better than Saving
Private Ryan? If we would only talk about SPR as a 20-minute movie
with just the battle scenes, I would agree. But, unfortunately, we
are talking about a kitschy, old-fashioned war movie with its good
moments, hardly a piece of "historic cinema" if you look at it in
whole. Shakespeare in Love, on the other hand, is just totally
enchanting: poetic, intelligent and funny. That's something you cannot
say often about a movie. Of course we all know SPR will win the Best
Picture, but not because it's the better movie, or as one of my friends
said, "Hell, it's an anti-war movie by Spielberg. They have to let
it win." Still, I think it's just a shame to underrate all the contenders
of SPR so much (or overrate SPR so much, however you look at it)."
BEST
WHOOPI GOLDBERG JOKE NOMINEES:
1. Something about how only crazy white people would kill themselves
trying to save Matt Damon. 2. Something about Steven Spielberg
and Harvey Weinstein -- "two naked Jews mud wrestling." (What
an image!) 3. Something about Roberto Benigni's upcoming comedy
about Pol Pot. 4. Something about "pale-skin" Best Actress
nominees -- Fernanda Montenegro, Cate Blanchett, Emily
Watson, Meryl Streep and Gwyneth Paltrow. 5. Something
about Clinton, Lewinsky and "The Thin White Line."
SECOND
STUPIDEST OSCAR STORY:
The Wall Street Journal (I can't link it for you, sorry.) is
claiming that actors will get huge pay increases if they win the Oscar.
Bull excrement. Little Gwynnie is raising her asking price by more
than double because of the box office for Shakespeare in Love,
regardless of whether she wins or not. Cate Blanchett is not
going to get $3 million for her next picture, no matter how many awards
she wins. But she would jump from $500,000 to $1 million. That's about
what Oscar can do for you. No one gets a multi-million payday for
an Oscar win. They often get more attention, especially up-and-comers
like Blanchett. A guy like James Coburn can get hot again,
like Jack Palance did for a couple of years. But it was City
Slickers box office, not the Oscar or the push-ups that made him
a seven-figure player. Same with Kathy Bates and Misery,
though she didn't really get box office credit for that film. She
and Glenn Close may be the most underpaid major actresses in
town. It was a little shocking when I saw that it was the Wall
Street Journal that was playing with this kind of Oscar hype.
I expect the truth from the WSJ. In fact, they are the only ones that
I expect the truth from. And they failed me this time.
READER
OF THE OSCARS 4:
Donner: "I am unphased by the nominees this year, probably just as
bored as you are, Dave. But if Little Gwynnie beats out Cate for the
Best Actress award, I will throw my pizza and beer all over Alamo
Draft House and probably have to go hit someone just to right the
wrongs in this world. My only consolation so far has been from Ted
Casablanca's gossip channels where he's not heard of anyone so
far who's voting for Little Gwynnie. We all know that someone out
there is, though, and it's just wrong. Wrong."
E
ME: I'll be working the big show with you all weekend. It's something
worth getting ready for. And send me your Oscar reactions Sunday night
if you want to see them Monday morning!