|
 |
Weekend,
7-8 August 1999
|
NEWS BY
THE NUMBERS
10. J3 By J-Squared: I think it
is great news that Joe Johnston is taking over the dino-reins
of Jurassic Park 3. Johnston is a guy who can lay on the emotion,
but he doesn't do it quite as cutely as Mr. Spielberg. He always finds
a way to do it so it isn't jarring. And he can handle action, especially
contained action, with the best of them. This is not a radical departure
for the series, but it may bring some real vigor back into the storytelling.
As I wrote back then, I felt that The Lost World was the only Spielberg
movie that Spielberg really didn't love making. It was just another
old rabbit being pulled out of his old bag of tricks. Johnston has long
been an overlooked director in this town. An insiders favorite. Kind
of the Frank Oz of action. He's worked his way up, a lost art
in this town, and I, for one, wish him the best. And that's something
I never expected to write about anyone making a third Jurassic Park
movie.
9. In
Good Hugh-Mor: Lew Irwin, who I often have some troubles
with analytically, knocked out a verbatim report about Thursday's deeply
tongue-in-cheek Hugh Grant interview on CNN that reminds me just
how shallow the interviewing pool has become: Question: "How did you get
started?" Grant: "I was one of the girls in the Von Trapp family in The
Sound of Music. You know, a white dress with a blue satin sash. And
I thought I was especially good as that." Question: "You've changed film
making, contributed so much to it, and I wondered what movie changed your
life?" Grant: "Well, I suppose there've been various seminal movies in
my life. Mary Poppins was probably the first one that I was obsessed
with." Question: "Your next film coming up is with Woody Allen...."
Grant: "He was pretty seminal."
8. Cuba,
Good (No Jr.): This is the first time I remember this happening
quite like this. We are having a return to a return to the '60s in the
development offices of studios all over town lately. More specifically,
movies are returning to Cuba. Mike DeLuca at New Line fought to
get rolling on the "Missiles of October" drama Thirteen Days against
a tide of "creative differences." And now Ron Howard and his partner
Brian Grazer (a true equal in a true partnership, rare in this
business) are putting together Bay of Pigs, another part of our
history with Cuba. Perhaps it's because Cuba is a hot destination right
now with the terminally hip and there is a sense that the island nation
will once again be a normal vacation destination as soon as Fidel Castro
passes on to that great tobacco plantation in the sky. Maybe we just don't
have anyone left to fight in the movies.
7. Kinky
Mouseketeer: You know, it's hard to resist a good story about
a Disney employee who works as a dominatrix on the side. I just hate indulging
in this level of gossipy garbage, but it's too damned funny and it is
a very slow news week. It turns out, according to the New York Post's
Page 6, that a copy editor at family.com, a Disney company, spends
her evenings as a dominatrix and advertises said proclivities over the
'Net as well. Mistress Scarlett, as she is known with a whip in her hand,
has a wide range of services available. Prices range from $250 to $1000
an hour. My favorite part of the story is the company's response: "Asked
if Disney was aware of its employee's life as a dominatrix, a company
spokesperson said, "Clearly, we keep tabs on the quality of family.com,
not the private lives of our employees." When informed that the employee
was a professional dominant who got paid for her services, the spokesperson
said, "I don't even know what that means." Perhaps Mistress Scarlett's
discovery is why Jeff Wells is leaving Disney-parented Mr. Showbiz
for different pastures. Teamwork is everything. And that Wells, he's a
kinky devil.
6. Pushing
Tom: Is Pat Kingsley nervous for her client Tom Cruise
after Eyes Wide Shut couldn't sustain any real box office? A story
showed up on The New York Post gossip page Friday about how Cruise
called up P.T. Anderson "begging" for a role in Anderson's Magnolia.
How very humble. Don't get me wrong. I think that Cruise's work with Kubrick
and his willingness to stand by the director and his film was as admirable
as anything any major actor has done in a long time. And I don't think
that anyone will need to back away from Eyes Wide Shut in the books
of film history. But while Cruise may have really wanted a role in Magnolia,
he ended up getting a nice piece of the movie for his two weeks work.
This was no gift. You see, agents who have superstar clients who have
been stuck on one low-paying picture by a genius director for over a year
don't really do humble. They spend that year sharpening their cutlery.
5. Go
Back: Speaking of Eyes Wide Shut, this has been a big
fat week for the movie in this column. For The Blair Witch Project
too. If you haven't read my 3000-plus word look at Eyes, here's another
chance (click here
for Working Hollywood). And if you haven't read the massive 6-page
Readers Rant & Rave on Blair Witch and EWS from Wednesday, here
too another chance (Click here.)
This has been a public service announcement from the Self Promotion And
Slow News Week Association.
4. Empty
Nest Syndrome: My family has left me. My sister Amy
and my nephew Charles (age 10) and niece Alli (age 8)
were here for 10 days. Here's the round-up. Four trips to Universal
Studios, which is fortunately within 15 minutes of where I live. The
kids really enjoyed the tram tour, but the rides based on Back To
The Future and Jurassic Park really rocked their worlds.
Big hits. They also enjoyed Universal's Mystery Men and Warner
Bros.' Deep Blue Sea and Iron Giant, though they were
disappointed that the giant didn't show up for the premiere. Sea World
was a big hit even though they got bored near the end of the Shamu show.
LegoLand was scratched, but I am told by many that it is a terrific
experience for the under 7 crowd. Dinner with my mother was okay, but
only because I grilled the steaks. Hurricane Harbor was a perfect place
to let the kids loose and to sit and relax for a few hours. I really
needed it. And Jack In The Box actually makes chicken chunks that the
kids could agree on. And if you don't think that's the most important
factor in a parent's day, you probably haven't been hanging out with
any 8 year-olds lately. I loved having my family here, even if I have
been sleep-deprived for a week. With the family around, one realizes
how single one can be in Hollywood. Too single.
3. Yatta
Yatta Yatta: I still haven't had time to read Talk
and I'm sure it will be a great read, but I'm already ready for a break
from the damned thing. It's a really funny part of the NY/LA disconnect
that parties get such hype in New York, and in L.A., they are "just
another party." I mean, when's the last time you saw national publicity
for a party in L.A.? No one stays late. Henry Kissinger is just
another German looking to bang a starlet without actually financing
a movie. And everything is infinitely disposable.
2. Down-ey
Again: Is there any story sadder than the saga of Robert
Downey Jr.? "It's like I have a shotgun in my mouth, my finger on
the trigger and I like the taste of gun metal." That comment that he made
to the judge makes a chill run down my spine. Previous warnings by the
judge "Just interrupted my business." What was the judge, who ordered
a three-year prison term for Downey, to do? Clearly, this guy doesn't
belong in jail for being an addict. But he is a danger to society. Just
ask the family that found him sleeping in their daughter's bed. Just keep
in mind that they found a handgun in the car with him last time he had
a wreck. And what's Hollywood to do? Forget about sending messages to
the public. What about messages in the industry? How many excuses should
talent give you? At what point does the repeated acceptance of this brilliant
performer back into the bosom of the business start feeding his addiction?
(And don't tell me about all the other druggies. I'm asking about him.
You can say that he needs our support, but don't start telling me about
Belushi, et al. In this case, everyone else is irrelevant. And more to
the point, they are irrelevant to Downey.) To see someone with so much
going for him throw it all so far away...really tragic.
1. Darwin
Does Hollywood: Turnabout is fair play. Or at least that seems
to be the position that talent agencies are trying to use in the ongoing
battle against the growing horde of manager/producers that are changing
the landscape of talent representation. The Association of Talent Agents
has had a series of meetings with the Screen Actors Guild seeking a change
in the rules that limit what agencies can do for their clients. To simplify,
agents can negotiate and cannot make more than 10 percent. Managers can
do everything but negotiate and can charge what they want. And managers
are not only taking full advantage of their freedom, but they are now
cutting agents completely out of the money loop by hiring lawyers for
a lot less to do the negotiation, which the managers pretend not to be
controlling. After failing to get legislation rolling to fight off the
managers, the agencies have now turned to SAG. If this works, which it
probably will eventually (think deregulation of TV ownership), the great
irony is that Mike Ovitz is the one pushing the agents to do this
by being so aggressive with his management company, AMG. And Ovitz was
the king of changing the playing field by changing the rules.
READER
OF THE DAY:
From DC: "Dear David Poland, what ever happened to the DVD
questionnaire? Are you going to run any of the responses? Sorry I can't
share your enthusiasm for Tina Brown and her doings. I know she's
not the only one responsible for what happened to the New Yorker,
but I can't help loathing her for the role she played in the magazine's
transformation from the only literate publication in this country to something
like a snooty version of People. I started reading the New Yorker
almost as soon as I knew how to read. I learned about literary criticism
from Edmund Wilson's book reviews, about the art of writing from
short stories by Tennessee Williams, Vladimir Nabokov, John
Cheever, and Mary McCarthy, not to mention learning about motion
pictures by scanning the list of revivals in the front pages of each issue.
I will have to admit that the movie reviews were pretty uninspired until
Pauline Kael came along, but now they absolutely stink like never
before. It's like the death of a dear friend."
And from B.S.:
"Regarding your question at the close of today's column, I'm annoyed by
fake letters getting through to you only because too many people accept
what they see and read at face value. Same goes for faked reviews over
on Aint It Cool. People don't seem to want to put anything in context.
A friend of mine absolutely hated Blair Witch, and refused to even think
about what the filmmakers were attempting to accomplish. Further, he judged
the film against the hype surrounding it. I think that's unfair. I was
present when my friend bad-mouthed TBWP to a few people, and I felt compelled
to present some kind of alternative opinion because they were nodding
their heads, murmuring, 'I didn't realize it was so awful. Maybe I won't
go see it this weekend after all.' My feeling is that TBWP, which I liked
a lot, is a worthwhile film for a number of reasons, and people ought
to see it in a theatre full of people. It's different, it's unusual, it's
very creepy (if not especially scary) and it was done without burning
untold millions. It's a film that presents itself as a puzzle to be worked
through.
I feel Eyes Wide
Shut should be seen for the same reasons. I didn't care for the film
at all. In fact, I completely disagree with your assessment of the film,
David. But it still ought to be viewed on the big screen and discussed.
How often does a film come along that actually provokes debate? And here
we have two! EWS was sunk by people who hated the film and refused to
discuss why they didn't like it, whereas moviegoers are hearing some negative
word of mouth on TBWP and are deciding to go see it anyway. Why? That's
another column, I guess."
E ME: I'm too tired to prompt
anyone to do anything. Express yourself and let me in on it if you would.
|