OSCAR
NOMINATION MORNING
Good morning…this is kind
of a starter kit for the column today. You see, I'm going to the Oscar
nomination party at 5:30 a.m. out here, broadcasting live on Yahoo!
Chat. The column will be updated sometime during the day today after
the first official event of the Academy season.
Or is it?
Harry Knowles ran a
list of categories and between 8 and 11 nominees for each category,
culled from early voting by an AICN reader who claims to have access.
I gather that this source has been right in offering up predictions
on other awards nominations and wins, so that explains why he or she
is both believable and believed by AICN.
That said, here is another
example of the irresponsibility of Harry Knowles and Ain't
It Cool News, throwing the entire Internet movie community into
the jackpot once again. And for what? Does Harry really believe that
most people who care about the Academy Awards want to have the surprise
ruined for them a day early? Or is Harry just indulging his ego at our
expense one more time?
I have cautiously stayed out
of The Harry Game over the last months. Partially, it's been because
I have my own fish to fry; partially because AICN is evolving and they
deserve a chance to make their leap before I judge every little thing
that turns up over there; and to be completely honest, partially because
I don't want to piss off Roger Ebert, who clearly loves Harry
and AICN and who has been very generous to me over the past year. (That
observation that will probably embarrass and upset Roger, who is a very
private and honorable man, more than anything I've written about Harry.
But if I am going to claim any moral high ground, I have to be willing
to completely honest.) But this is exactly the kind of thing that goes
beyond personal irritation. This is Harry pi**ing on my business…on
my future…on my industry's future…and I can't remain silent while he
does it.
The problem is, Harry knows
better. If some tiny site ran this kind of thing, I could understand.
They need the publicity. Harry doesn't need it. Worse, since AICN is
the first word out of publicists' mouths when they talk about the Internet
and movies (even if AICN's hit count doesn't actually deserve that status…Harry
has claimed to at least one potential advertiser that he has about the
same traffic as E-Bay,) what Harry does reflects on all of us where
it really matters…with the industry that we feed and on which we feed
off. And "we" includes Harry as much as anyone. When Harry publishes
stunts like this, it gives everyone an excuse to say, "We fear the Internet",
which is one of the stupidest screeds ever. At least LucasFilm was honest
with themselves and everyone else when they banned Internet people from
Star Wars: Episode One -- The Phantom Menace junket because they
wanted to control the Web traffic for their movie. Of course, they got
screwed harder by the TV shows and newspapers than they ever would have
been on the 'Net. But it is acceptable for people in this business to
treat an entire medium as a monolith. And Harry is giving them more
ammo.
But for the sake of fairness,
let's look at this from one more side…does the public's lust for insight
overwhelm any "old fashioned" rules? Well, this is my opinion. Immediate
gratification is for young children. As one ages, one realizes that
a big part of the joy of engaging your senses with something you've
been anticipating is the wait. Yes, there is a rush to opening those
Christmas presents before the morning comes. But here is my question…if
you open the presents early, what is the joy of Christmas morning? They're
just toys. Toys are forgotten. It is the wait that's exciting.
Hell, what was the most fun
and most remembered part of the Star Wars hype last year? Countingdown's
camp-out in front of the Chinese. Sure, the camp-out was sponsored and
part of a Web strategy (Sorry, Lincoln, but it was a successful strategy),
but it was exciting nonetheless because it spoke to what really makes
event movies fun…the anticipation.
The current wave of entertainment
writing suffers from an obsession with premature e-information. And
it all started with Harry. It was excusable when it began because Harry
was building something. Harry's enthusiasm and ignorance was palpable.
And so, previously reflective writers suddenly became obsessed with
beating Harry to the punch. Of course, dozens of writers had information
that ran on Ain't It Cool for weeks before AICN got it and posted it,
but held it back because there was a code amongst journalists. No more.
The fabric is being torn down. And to what benefit?
You know what the best part
of being a movie critic/writer is? I see movies before people are talking
about them. I see them fresh. I don't even read the press kit stuff
they hand me as I enter the movie until after I've seen the film. Why?
Because the glory of movies is that they take you somewhere that you
can't anticipate. And then, when they are good, you can go see them
again and appreciate subtleties and complexities that one viewing won't
expose.
The "closed shop" of Hollywood
was closed too tight for too long. And for what part he had in opening
the doors a bit, I honor and respect Harry Knowles. But now that
he's let a little sunlight through, like anyone who's gotten what they
wanted, he is not satisfied anymore. So the door has to open a little
wider. And wider. And wider. Until there is no magic left. I don’t think
that's what Harry wants. But he's crossed the line again today. And
I hope he thinks the better of it as time goes by.
P.S. Please, no e-mail including
jibes about Harry's weight or looks or accent. Those comments diminish
you more than him.
READERS
OF THE DAY: Two subjects
flowed in on Monday. First, a theory that many wrote in with about The
Beach and Snow Day. And then, a series of punishment options
for Rex Reed after his "lapse in memory".
Peggy writes: "I just
read your column regarding your surprise that Snow Day finished
the weekend with that huge number…and to me the answer is obvious. Leo!
I stood in line on both Friday and Saturday night at a cineplex in New
Jersey and watched young person after young person being turned away
because of the "R" rating. I believe a whole lot of that 14.8 million
actually belongs to The Beach....when the kids snuck in with
their Snow Day tickets. Had this occurred to you?? I saw the
movie 3 times on the weekend, and even though the audience was quite
varied, there were a whole lot of "underaged" viewers in the theater....so
how'd they get in?? To me...no other explanation."
And Now, The Rex Patrol:
Michael: "Rex must still
be mourning the death of Hedy Lamarr, who was well known for
shoplifting in her day. Let's give the guy a break, he truly loves the
idols of yesteryear like Ava Gardner and Lana Turner and
still mentions them in his columns from time to time."
Tim: "For Senior Rex
Reed - His punishment: A new employment opportunity as the head
critic for "Sixty Second Preview". That way he can join the "It's the
best [insert genre] of the year" club where he belongs. And all because
they provided him with the nonfat yogurt of his choice at the press
junket (as well as the occasional free CD!)"
John: "Put him in a
10x10 cell with nothing but The Mod Squad and High School
High to watch for seven days. He'll never shoplift again."
Ellen: "Poor Rex
Reed (ha ha ha)! Busted for boosting CDs can only be punishable
by forcing him to sit Clockwork Orange-style to a marathon of
ALL of the worst movies EVER created!!! Or else, send him to Iran and
let them cut off his hands. I'd like to see him try to write a movie
review with hooks! Am I mean? Am I cruel? Oh yeah!!!"
And finally, some perspective
from Aaron: "I don't care about Rex Reed personally, but
I hope that someday the police can pin a crime (ANY CRIME, PLEASE!)
on Gene Shalit. Please. Put him away for a long time. For bad
hair. For something. He needs to be put away. Or at least never allowed
to review a movie again."
E
ME: Why do I have a feeling that most of you already started writing?