BEIJING
MOTION PICTURE &
TELEVISION CONFERENCE - DAY 2
The future of the movie business in China revealed itself
today
for about a tenth of a second. After that, it was all questions.
But let's not jump to too many conclusions. The ongoing buzz phrase
for this conference has been "open exchange of ideas." Today was the
wide public face. Tomorrow, the conversation starts in earnest. How
open the exchange is will only be known in time.
We started the day with breakfast
at 8 a.m. "WHAT?," you wonder. "No Taiji?!?!?" Uh, no. No wake-up call
equals no Taiji. And Chinese cooking equals a breakfast of toast and
coffee. Of course, that may be my fault. The bacon was scary, the scrambled
eggs were
inexplicable and I couldn't even consider a shot at the
soy, bean curd whatever the hell that was. I know, I'm an American food
wimp. So sue me.
We had to rush out of breakfast
because we left for lunch at 11 and I had to figure out how to get onto
the Internet to send the column in and check my e-mail. I was eventually
told that calling my ISP in Los Angeles was my best bet. And so I did.
27 minutes for only $58.22. Cool. Looks like that phone call is only
going to be for column transmission for the rest of this trip. If you
want to call me on your bill, I'm at the Capital Hotel in Beijing, 651-29988.
Lunch was at a popular, newish
restaurant in the Chinatown section of Beijing. Yes, there is a Chinatown
in this China town. If the photos transmit, you can take a look at some
of the remarkable ways of letting you know that the food is fresh. From
fish to snails to turtle to snake, it's quite the live menagerie. And
just feet away, apparent poverty. There is a lot of modernization in
Beijing, but there is also a real sense of the ancient and the poor
still overwhelming the newer grandeur at times.
Lunch was quite good, though
I barely got to taste the many offerings, as we had to run to the official
opening of the conference. As we got to the convention center, we were
sent into a small, beautifully furnished room, where we were greeted
by various dignitaries. And it fit the mold of current relations that
we Americans stood around, waiting for our hosts to give us the word
to sit and our hosts refused to sit, not wanting to be rude to their
American guests. Eventually, an announcement was made and we worked
it out, but we spent a long while smiling at one another and nodding.
Once seated, we were greeted
with a series of speeches and we were asked if any of we Americans had
anything to add. Normally, I would warm to the task, but I am a journalist
and it is not my role here to lead, but to watch. And so I waited
and
waited. Eventually, Shawn West, a.k.a. K. Shawn West Hankins,
of HBO Movies, led the way, offering his thanks and that of his company,
Time-Warner, for the invitation to the party. Well, I certainly wasn't
about to rise in the name of the oligopoly of Time- Warner. More kind
words were exchanged and we eventually headed into the big hall, where
about 100 Chinese civilians were already waiting, joined by our group
of about 80, Chinese and American.
The big speeches were
well,
speeches. It reminded me why guys who get elected get elected. They
give great speech. If you are not a professional charismatic, public
speaking is probably not for you. Of course, that hasn't stopped anyone
yet. And to be fair, if style wasn't valuable, content often was.
There's no real point in me
speaking about the American speakers. I know what they have to say.
But the Chinese perspective was occasionally amazing. Once again, this
is a first impression based on these speeches, so temper your reading
and keep an eye out for further speculation based on further conversation.
But
There seemed to be a heavy
focus, on the part of the Chinese speakers, on technology as the route
to this country's success in the film business as they continue to pursue
a more open business relationship with the world. Now, I havent
had to ask why they believe that being up-to-date will help them build
their film distribution or production businesses in more significant
ways than currently possible
or possible 10 years ago for that
matter. It seems like a rather backward concept to me
one that
Hollywood has fallen prey to in the past. I don't have a problem with
movie technology, but in the end, the movies are a lot more than technology.
I don't think that these people don't understand that. However, it is
a classic mistake of Hollywood to make determinations about the future
based on the performance of specific movies. Here as in much of the
rest of the world, Titanic is the big dog of all time. And so,
effects mean a lot in China. And sex, someone tried to explain, won't
sell. Of course, in that case, the example was The Last Emperor
and a scene with the emperor and two concubines. I think that if the
Chinese government wants to let sex sell, it surely will.
But I digress
It seems to me that the effort
here is to prepare China for the future and then to allow the west to
have more access to this enormous market. Or perhaps there is no real
intent to open the gates all that wide, but the creative types understand
that if the door is opened wide enough, there is no stopping the flow
of Hollywood entertainment.
There was also an interesting
report on Chinese film distribution. Here are the short strokes. China
now has about 3000 screens, many of them way below traditional American
standards. There are about 150 films released each year here, 10 from
America, 40 from other outside countries and about 100 from here in
China.
But now, I must go. My apologies.
It's been a long day, I'm still dealing with jet lag and I thought I
could take the karaoke on as pre-column writing exercise. No. I'm blindingly
exhausted and I'm not thinking cleverly enough to ask your indulgence
as a writer. In fact, I'm so tired, I can't even seem to get the digital
camera to download. So, I will ask your indulgence for my premature
absence. I'll catch up tomorrow. Promise.
READER
OF THE DAY: From
The J: "Just wanted to wish you a great trip, and an interesting
conference, it was fun to read your arrival journal this AM. As a movielover
and a person with an interest in the changes happening in China, the
subject of how our movies get there and play there has interested me
for a while, and I thank you for taking the trip and reporting to us
on the conference--should be very interesting. What a huge potential
audience, but what mystery clouds that country. I'm particularly interested
in what, if anything, is said at the conference about video piracy.
If it's talked about, please mention what's said in thb. Thanks so much.
Hope the jet lag isn't too bad, and the conference is everything you
hope it will be."
E
ME: Video piracy is the first topic of tomorrow morning. I'll try
to be awake.