THE
GOOD:
When I was a teen, the cool way to spend the summer was the teen
tour
traveling with 30 or 40 other kids by bus through the U.S.
or Europe or wherever. Not exactly Girls Gone Wild, but still, a lot
of fun. But now, Ive found
something that kicks the heck out of that old summer thing. There is a non-profit organization called the
Young Filmmakers Academy, started by Shannon Gardner in 1998,
dedicated to giving kids an opportunity to learn about being part of
the creative experience of filmmaking.
And this summer, they have seven workshops, including three in
Europe (one for adults, even) that seem like sensational opportunities
for kids who have a real interest in starting a life in film.
Interested? Find out
more at www.youngfilmmakers.org.
THE
BAD:
The L.A Times Patrick Goldstein broke the story
on Friday that Sony had paid theater owners to insure that the trailer
for The Animal played with The Mummy Returns by some exhibition
circuits. As an individual event,
no big deal. Sony got something
they wanted and were willing to pay for it. But as DreamWorks' Terry Press went on record saying, this
could be the beginning of something ugly.
Trailers are the best marketing tool that studios have in selling
their films. They speak to a
targeted audience, its an uninterrupted two-minute sell and you
can come pretty close to closing the sale right there.
And, best of all, the distribution of the ads is pretty close
to free. But not anymore
maybe. Generally, theater owners limit their trailer
count to four before each film. In
this case, Sony had already taken a slot for Final Fantasy, Universal
had the slot right before the film, as is the tradition and in normal
situations, two other studios might get the other two slots. But The Animal needed all the help it could get. So, Sony bought a slot for a second film. But if $100,000 is there to help push The
Animal to The Mummy Returns crowd, how much would a Pearl
Harbor slot be this weekend to launch, say, Vanilla Sky or
The Majestic? And what slot do you want your movie in? The first, while people are still settling
in? The second slot? The third?
How much? So many possible
ways for the exhibitors to get back at the studios!!! (Read Patricks story here.)
THE
UGLY: Landmark Theaters
was happily plucked out of bankruptcy well, in the process of
by former Landmark execs Paul Richardson and Bert Manzari. Good news, especially for art film lovers.
But heres The Ugly it seems that just before this
deal was done, one Landmark landlord was on the verge of kicking Landmark
out onto the Chicago streets. But,
as the story goes, the landlord didnt realize that Landmark wouldnt
just leave their theaters intact for the next possible tenant. Oops. Landmark
threatened to pull everything out. The landlord backed off. The
lease negotiations continue.
BOX
OFFICE EXTRA:
You can find it here.
BIG
LIST O QUOTES: I
think were going to go bi-weekly on this list. In the meantime, Voices of Hollywood
has finally made the list after weeks of existence. Look for a pull quote on the new Moulin Rouge ads. And I didnt even get to sit down with
Baz and Nicole.
NOT
BAD AD WATCH: Speaking
of my pull quote, it is one of nine from online outlets. Very interesting. The tag line is Get Online For Moulin Rouge
The
Critics Already Have! Of
course, they cheat a little, adding Newsweek.com and Time.com,
but hey
its good for the web.
READER
OF THE DAY:
Dear Jurisprudence writes:
The idea of re-making Helter Skelter, as a theatrical
feature, is truly perverse. From day one, this was clearly TV movie material
and TV movie material only.
The only reason to make a movie out of Manson's story is to exploit
and cash in on the brutality of the Manson gang's murders.
They're not going to make a meaningful, intelligent film because
no person capable of such a film would ever get involved with this.
Helter Skelter isn't Oliver Twist. This is real life and repeatedly commodifying
it in this way seems consistent with Hollywood's commodification of
the Holocaust, slavery, etc.
Are
they planning a big screen OJ Simpson movie yet? They can get Anthony Hopkins to play OJ and, after killing
his wife, he can eat her with Clarice.
If they do go ahead with the Manson movie they should, for the
sake of consistency (in their perversity), hire Roman Polanski
to direct. Hell, they might as well enlist the unimprisoned members of the
Manson gang to play supporting roles (ie. lawyers, judges, themselves,
etc.). I'm almost getting enthusiastic about this.
Not Pa
sends this thought about yesterdays ROTD:
Let's face it, how did a piece of crap like Gone in
60 Seconds actually got to 100 million dollars in the box office?
I'm currently in High School and I can tell you plenty of guys here
often bring their latest issue of "Import Tuner" to school
to share with their classmates or like any guys would, check out the
girls. Recently, free passes to the test screening of The Fast and
the Furious were given to students taking auto shop. And the word
just spread quickly and everyone I know who has their hands on these
tickets were actually looking forward to it not because of the cast,
not because of the director(thank god for that), but because of the
cars that appeared in the trailer. While I'm 16 and thinks that
The Fast and the Furious looks like a straight-to-video movie, there
are other among my peers who will actually shell out 9 bucks just to
see that cars. For me, if I want to see a good car chase, I'd take out
my Ronin laserdisc. But believe me, The Fast and the Furious
WILL be a success, and Gone in 60 Seconds was a success because
of the 15-25 teen market. Never underestimate the power of a teen, David,
especially ones who likes cars.
E
ME: Bombs away!!!