WEEKEND
REVIEW
Well, arent
my predictions on teen-driven product in the crapper lately!?!?!
But there
is a lot more at stake when The Fast and the Furious opens to
an estimated $41.6 million. Last
weekend, Tomb Raider started with $47.7 million. By the end of the theatrical runs of the two
films, that $6 million difference in openings will mean about $15 to
$20 million in domestic revenue
less than $10 million in money
returning to the studio. The
Fast and the Furious cost a little more than half of what Tomb
Raider cost. There was no massive Pepsi tie-in. There was no great brand awareness coming out of years and years
of videogame attention and marketing.
The P&A on Universals release was likely more than
30 percent lower than Paramounts.
Yet at the box office
One could
write this off as an any given movie on any given weekend
phenomena, but its not. And
much as I would love to give Universals Terry Curtin a
shoulder ride for genius marketing
and they did a fine job
something more is at play. The Fast and the Furious is kind of
the Twister of teen wannabe-R hard-on-and-an-action-thrill movies. Angelina Jolies bra collection
for Tomb Raider probably cost more than the entire cast of talented
but minor name young actors Rob Cohen and Universal put together
for TF-squared. Yet at the box office
The scary
thing is that this is about the scariest box office phenomena in a while.
TF-squared may be a good movie.
I havent seen it and its quality will be reflected in next
weekends box office, not opening weekend.
(That set of qualities goes back into Terry Curtains
credit list.) Whats scary
is that success reed repetition and much as I love looking back at AIP
and Corman, cheap hyperactivity is not the brand of cinema that I want
to be faced with for the next three years. No doubt, a great work will come out of all of this. Some person will take all this energy and connect
it to a real story with real characters, much as The Wachowskis did
in The Matrix. But while
we wait for the needle in that haystack, we are going to be deluged
by crap that makes Moulin Rouge look like it was edited on sedatives.
On top of
that, this is another example of frontloaded box office.
While TF-squared is racing to the top of the charts, Lara Croft
took an estimated 58 percent dive in weekend two.
Despite this, Paramount will still be pleased to have had that
massive start last weekend. The higher percentage of box office to hit
in the first weeks, the better their cut.
The old traditional 50/50 formula for the studio/exhibitor split
is more like 60/40 these days. On
Tomb Raider, it may end up being more like 75/25, given that
the film will have taken in more than 80 percent of its gross in the
first three weekends.
Oh yeah
and Dr. Dolittle 2 opened to an estimated $26.7 million.
Funny how that becomes a small story in a weekend like this.
Three years after the original, the sequel opened to, by estimate,
about 8 percent less than the original.
Thats quite unusual
in a good way.
Look for Dr. Dolittle 2 to be one of the quietest $100
million movies of the year.
Among holdovers,
the news is that a lot of people seem to prefer the idea of seeing Shrek
again over seeing Atlantis the first time. While the Disney actioner is off an estimated
35 percent in just its second weekend, DreamWorks' jolly green
magnet is estimating in a drop of less than half of that, at 17 percent,
in its sixth weekend.
THE
GOOD:
There were some interesting stories floating around out there
this weekend. One reader sent in a link to a story in the
Minneapolis Star Tribune. Writer
Colin Covert takes a look at The Fast and the Furious
with the perspective that there is a lot more going on when the boys
grab their stick shifts. Very funny. Maybe interesting stuff. (Its here)
Meanwhile,
in Nicosia, the local film club showed, we assume, an uncut version
of Catherine Breillats Romance
the theater
operator, Michael Papas may be in jail today.
The film is in the midst of a battle over censorship and while
the ban of the film that authorities sought is now on the losing side
of an ongoing legal battle, Papas was ordered by the court to put his
print in the courts custody, pending appeal.
He refused. And announced that he would proceed with the
scheduled screening. No word
on the wires about what finally happened, but the Friday story is here.
THE
BAD: On the bad side,
David Ansen of Newsweek has a good story in this weeks
magazine about his experiences with being quoted -- and misquoted --
by the studios. (Click here.)
And John
Horn, who has inspired me to rant & rave on Wednesday (Yall
come back now, hear!) wrote a piece on John Stockwells
film, crazy/beautiful, that give a good account of the current
paranoia that movie studios are experiencing when it comes to films
that push uncomfortable buttons, especially when there are teens involved. (Surprisingly, Horn does not mention Disney subsidiary Miramaxs
dumping of O, which was so overt that Miramax actually paid a
settlement with the producers to make a pending lawsuit go away.) The thing is that despite the restraints, crazy/beautiful
still stands as one of the most complex, disturbing, unresolved teen
dramas I have ever seen. It
got under my skin to the degree that I am trying to see it a second
time before I review the film.
You may remember
that I wrote about Kirsten Dunsts choice to keep her bust
covered. That was a little cynical,
but I think its important for all of us, from John Horn
to David Poland and beyond, to point out that in this case, despite
the studio caution, there is a tough, interesting film here. Anyway, the story is located here.
PAGE
TWO: Manning Pearl Harbor With
Artificial Intelligence