February
6, 2004
Son of a…
(please hum Girl
From Ipanema to yourselves for a moment)
The Hot Button will
now be on a four-syllable time delay. Any time I get the urge to say…
(Tall and tan and
young and lovely, The girl from….)
And now…
Bernardo Bertolucci’s
The Dreamers has the primary characteristics of a porn movie…
and I’m not really talking about the sex. It starts by establishing
a story that actually seems kind of interesting. But as soon as the
sex stuff starts, it basically degrades into a bunch of scenes giving
audiences a few minutes to recover before getting back to what Bernardo
is really interested in… a stunning piece of ass who never puts on any
underwear and couldn’t act her way out of anything more than a see-through
negligee.
The thing is, I
really love the notion of the film. It is more than kind of interesting.
It could have been a timeless examination of our tendency to distract
ourselves with personal obsessions while painful and important things
are happening in the real world. If this were a really good film, it
would be analogous to Iraq. If this were a really good film, it would
be analogous for apathy about the election. If this were a really good
film, it would embarrass us for allowing Janet Jackson’s right
breast from dominating the news cycle for an entire week.
But it is not a
really good film. The truth is – and most critics will be too myopic
to even consider this – Gigli is a significantly more ambitious
effort to examine human sexuality and its effect on human interaction
and perception. Gigli did fail. But - with its sexually ambivalent
hitwoman, a mentally challenged boy who still has a clear sexual drive,
and Larry Gigli, who is more emotionally retarded than the bo - in retrospect,
if Gigli had been made independently and been free to explore
its sexual themes without the limitations and gloss of a studio production,
it might have gotten very interesting indeed.
The Dreamers
has all the pedigree of a film that is about something other than Eva
Green’s head-to-toe iconic physicality. The set-up is an American
teen landing in 1968 Paris and joining in with the cinematheque crowd,
though maintaining a distance as he observes the movie movement. When
the government gets in the way of the passionate pursuit of Jerry
Lewis’ genius, our hero hooks up with beautiful twins whose absentee
parents just happen to be headed out of town for a month, leaving a
remarkable set in which the trio can romp for 2 hours.
What will these
too-beautiful social onanists do when left to their own devices? Will
their bourgeois notions ever be challenged? Where will the incestuous
subtext between the twins lead to some insight? Will Bertolucci ever
take the serious revolution of the world outside infringe on the disconnected
claims of passion inside this apartment of musk?
Maybe there is a
sequel in the works…
Without even going
for films established as classics, there are titles that do what Bertolucci
forgot to. Roman Coppola’s CQ is a better film about film
obsession in that era. Kirsten Sheridan’s Disco Pigs actually
burrows into the emotional turmoil of the separation-by-sexual-coming-of-age
of a dangerously close boy and girl. Jean-Jacques Annaud’s
The Lover was sexier and more insightful about young lust in the
hothouse of a contained space while the world outside is in turmoil.
What Bertolucci
seemed ready to tap into was the insidious nature of Woody Allen’s
work, movies that speak to those of us who can afford to love them.
It seemed that he was prepared to pierce the façade, as Allen
did himself in Crimes & Misdemeanors and Husbands &
Wives, acknowledging the real pain and self-delusion behind the
cityscapes. Perhaps sex might have been for Bertolucci what humor is
for Allen, a way to avoid the pain, but eventually to expose
it.
But instead, what
we got was Bertolucci’s version of Allen’s “funny ones,” where there
was just enough insight to get the audience busting a gut. Bernardo
was out, it seems, to bust a hymen. Unfortunately, his movie is not
nearly as sexy as Allen’s were funny. And the fascinating premise disappears
soon after Ms. Green’s foundation garments… and neither ever comes back.
E
Me. Come back.