April
28, 2004
I
seem to be in nerve-hitting mode these days…
Yesterday, a passing
reference about the issue of race and the voting on American Idol
drew a lot of mail, almost all of it angry that race came up. Sorry.
But there is no other logical explanation. Like the anti-Semitism of
The Passion of The Christ, it doesn't mean that anyone who likes
the show, any of the white contestants or Mel Gibson's movie
is an anti-Semite or racist.
It is the most insidious
form of "ism"… the kind we find easiest to avoid responsibility
for. After all, the black guy won last year, so all bets are off...
right? Wrong. It was one of Spike Lee's most accurate commentaries
on the subtleties of modern racism when Mookie asked John Turturro's
Pino about all the black entertainers he admired. The answer, paraphrased,
was "They aren't black."
Ruben Studdard
is as black as Denzel Washington, which is to say, without questioning
either man's ethnic credentials, they have both risen above race as
personalities. Tamyra Gray, Christina Christian, Trenyce and
Kimberly Locke all hit American Idol's glass ceiling for
black women, which is the only reasonable explanation for Nikki McKibbin
or RJ Helton. Josh Gracing might be understandable
because of his military status.
You don't want to
believe that race is a factor? Okay. We'll see if Fantasia Barrino,
who is clearly the closest thing to a complete performer to appear in
any season of American Idol, makes it into the Top Two, besting Kimberly
Locke's third place finish. But this week, it was the extraordinary
juxtaposition of three singers who would have been picked first by anyone
choosing sides in a sing-off against the three talented but fading personalities
that made it all so shocking. Would anyone actually argue that Fantasia
Barrino does not belong in the top half of this group? So instead
of trying a statistical end run, offer a real explanation that doesn't
end up treading on race.
And read the brilliant Heather
Havrilesky in Salon, who writes, in part: "Um, racism isn't
really a conspiracy. It's pretty much out in the open. This is a racist
country. Most people in this country are racists. Every single black
person in this country knows it. Can't you just take their word for
it? Even if you don't personally see evidence of racism in this country,
can't you trust those who are in the position to see it, those who are
telling you, day after day, that it's there? Or do you not trust them?"
I am not a big race
of crying race, religion or political philosophy as a reason for the
actions of those with whom I disagree. But sometimes, even if it is
not a raging "ism," it is just too obvious to avoid. A vote
for John Stevens is not a vote for lynching black men. But like
all popularity contests, there is subtext. If John Stevens could
sing, he would be Clay Aiken. But he can't… at least not well
enough to do anything but headline the "Rat Pack" tribute
in the lounge at the Las Vegas Club. So in the immortal words of QT/DH,
"If that's a fact, tell me, am I lying?
THE
MOVIE COLUMN: Oh yes, I still write about movies. Another
thing that got a lot of people screaming was my estimate of Spider-Man
2 grossing under $200 million. The 15 Weeks of Summer column is
due to start a week from Thursday. But I will admit, the number might
have been low. That said, I still don't expect any film this summer
to break $300 million. But more details in time.
CLOSING
ON KILL BILL: I'm not going to waste a lot of time going
back to examine the entrails of a film that is already in its death
throes. But the two most striking things about my return to Kill
Bill, Volume 2 are - and you probably want to read something else
now if you haven't seen the film or are at all concerned about spoilers…
1. My sudden awareness
that the film is autobiographical and that Bill is a symbolic representation
of Quentin's father, The Bride is his mother and he is little B.B.,
born to be every bit the prick his absent father was, only to be saved
by the love of his mother. The whole film, ultimately, is a metaphor
for the single parent and child, the surviving parent willing to do
anything, overcome all obstacles, in order to embrace their progeny,
while the absent parent deserves to have his heart ripped out, albeit
without the blood.
Besides The Bride
and B.B., who are the heroic characters in this piece? The grandparents.
Pai Mei and Hattori Hanzo… both well into retirement age. The villains?
Besides Bill, a series of sexy, young women. Budd is essentially left
off the hook, as he is already out of the death game, feels real guilt
and in the end, only shows cruelty to The Bride in response to what
he believed was her betrayal of his brother's love.
2. Bill had to know
that The Bride was in the hospital she was in, so the Elle Driver scene
in Volume 1 makes absolutely no sense. He would have to know she was
there, being raped on a regular basis in her coma. Elle Driver would
not need to find her at all. And the threat of killing her while still
in a coma would have been discussed and dismissed. The only member of
his team who could have been attacked before he knew The Bride was awake
and on the run was Vernita, who was within driving distance of the hospital.
The choice not to
use this and the fact of B.B.'s survival against The Bride before the
final sequence suggests that Bill wanted his old team, including his
brother, to die and that he was also ambivalent about the survival of
The Bride. Nothing about going through the list of DiVAS got The Bride
into any better position to kill Bill. So if she knew her child was
alive, she surely would have made Bill's place her first stop. And as
Bill seems to feel he can get The Bride to join him in parenting their
child… in fact, seems to think it's a good idea… why would he cause
her to run the gauntlet of DiVAS?
Could the entire
movie be nothing more but a daydream of B.B./Quentin about honoring
the mother and offing the father?
I'm just sayin…
READER
OF THE DAY: LONG SHARP STICK writes: "The facts:
5 mostly white people were voted off before the first African-American.
Season 2 had an African-American winner of season 2 even though Clay
is outselling Ruben. 33 percent of the finalists -- voted in by America
-- are African-American. that's more than double the percentage of blacks
in the population (15%).Every remaining contestant has been in the bottom
3. Hudson had been the top vote getter in a previous round (guess the
racists didn't vote that week and were simply biding their time). They
all suck anyway so it's basically a crapshoot.
Just because every white grandma is voting for John Stevens doesn't
mean they hate black people; It means they're treating it like a popularity
contest, and it's their right to do so. "He's a nice boy."
And when you perform the best -- as Hudson did the other night -- you
run the risk of people thinking that they don't have to vote for you.
They give their votes to their #2 thinking that there is no way for
the best singer of the night to go out.
Whining about racism isn't helping anyone -- especially when London
is probably going to win (and deservedly so)."
And MR. NICE
DAY writes: "You don't claim the US is racist, and then just
move on. Listen, the DIVAS are the most talent on that show, but what
do you expect from young girls who find something cut about John Stevens?
What does America expect?
And again, as I
pointed out to you last year and the record sales prove this right,
this is AMERICAN/POP IDOL! Clay Aiken sold, because of POP music, and
Studdard did not sell as much due to new wave R&B. You can call
America racist all you want, but these girls do not like soul singing
divas. Doesn't make them racist, it means they have bad tasste.
But again, how racist
is a country that chose an African-American idol last time? Not that
racist if you ask me. Those three women do not have any charisma, just
talent. John Stevens has neither, but they find him cute. Libidos beat
sense any day, but slam our country as racist, is absolutely fucking
dumb. Sorry, but it is.
Personally, George
Huff should be the American Idol. No one else touches him on charisma
or talent, even the two remaining divas. If John Stevens win, it just
shows the people voting find him cute, and Simon Fuller has some serious
work to do."
Finally, NOT
SEVEN, BUT UP writes: "A technical note regarding the adequacy
of any particular video resolution for matching 35mm. Less than 10 years
ago, Pixar set out to decide how many lines of resolution was required
to drive 35mm to the limits of its capacity, and the answer was a pretty
clear 1600 lines. Weta rendered its LOTR frames to
something like 1700 lines (overscanned at 1.66--or 1.77, I'm not sure
which--from which was cropped the 'Scope frame for release, so that's
1700 spread across much greater height than the end frame). I don't
think anybody would describe any Pixar or LOTR film as "soft",
so if you want numbers for what's really needed, there you are."
E
ME: How can you resist?