September
30,
2004
With Tom Freston
rattling his New Paramount saber at Paramount Classics and Harvey
Weinstein doing everything but serving boiling oil in Starbucks
cups to get much of the current Miramax staff out the door without paying
out their contracts before announcing The New Miramax and UA's Hotel
Rwanda being pushed hard for Oscar while UA is about to be sucked
into The New Sony Pictures and Warner Indie is still looking for its
first hit and Focus is rouging it up with Chuck and zombies… it seems
like every Dependent but Searchlight is under some serious scrutiny.
The immediate threat
seems to be to Paramount Classics, a division that that has failed to
hit it out of the park no matter what kind of quality they have brought
to the cinema. The statistics are clear. The division has never lost
money for the studio over any of their years in business. But the biggest
grosser for the division was You Can Count On Me, a huge critical
success with 2 Oscar and 5 Indie Spirit nominations and all… but still,
only $9.2 million at the domestic box office.
Istvan Szabo's
Sunshine managed $5.1 million… Sofia Coppola's debut,
The Virgin Suicides, did $4.9 million and the great German dramatic
comedy Mostly Martha grossed $4.2 million here in the U.S.
Only five other
Paramount Classics releases grossed more than $1 million. Three were
from Patrice Leconte (The Man on the Train - $2.5 million,
Intimate Strangers - $1.9 million and The Girl on the Bridge
- $1.7 million). One was an Ed Burns semi-miss, Sidewalks
of New York, with $2.4 million and the Polish Bros' Northfork
with $1.4 million.
The taste of the
studio is pretty strong. Here are some of the quality titles that have
come through theatrical on their way to greater success in home entertainment:
An American Rhapsody
- $850,000
Bloody Sunday - $775,000
Passion of Mind - $775,000
Focus - $650,000
Love Me If You Dare - $560,000
Mean Creek - $550,000
The Way Home - $450,000
Our Lady of the Assassins - $400,000
Trekkies - $320,000
Festival in Cannes - $300,000
In none of these
cases, from bottom to top, is there a major breakout box office hit
that failed to happen. But it is not hard to imagine squeezing more
from a title like Bloody Sunday, The Way Home, Trekkies, or Our
Lady of The Assassins, much less a widely appealing title like Mostly
Martha if they were in the hands of a Miramax.
And that is almost
exactly what Tom Freston had to say. To quote:
"We've had
Paramount Classics, but it's been an also-ran. Miramax, Lion's Gate.
This is an area we want to be in. We think we can be major players here.
We're looking at acquiring pictures as well as producing and looking
at strengthening the management team."
Now, to compare
what opportunities Paramount Classics has had afforded it by big Paramount
to what Miramax did is just stupid. Miramax started as an truly independent,
huge risk-taking, hard charging company that was in some serious financial
distress when Disney bought it 11 years ago for about what Kill Bill,
Vol 1 grossed last year and significantly less than Kill Bill
cost to produce and distribute. Paramount Classics was created and
carved a niche out for itself in the manically frugal Jon Dolgen
era where they did as was demanded of them… they earned a decent return
on investment and never lost the company money.
But Lions Gate seems
like a more reasonable and more interesting comparative study.
Lions Gate has had
15 films gross over $10 million domestically in its history. Seven films
have grossed over $30 million. Three of those films came from Miramax,
where Fahrenheit 9/11, Dogma and O were not able to be
released for a variety of reasons. Three of the others were released
in the last 12 months - The Punisher with $34 million, Open
Water with $31 million and Cabin Fever with $21 million.
The seventh film is Monster's Ball, which rode its Oscar-winner
Halle Berry to $32.5 million total domestic.
Of those seven films,
the only one that would have had any chance to come under Paramount
Classics' business plan would be Monster's Ball, which had just
a $4 million budget. Open Water, which was a festival pick-up,
could potentially have been at P.C., but they have never had the kind
of P&A support available to them that Lions Gate spent in getting
it to that $31 million gross.
Eight other Lions
Gate films grossed between $10 million and $15 million - (in order from
highest to lowest) American Psycho, Godsend, Dirty Dancing: Havana
Nights, Frailty, House of 1000 Corpses, Confidence, Girl With A Pearl
Earring, and The Cookout.
Again, only American
Psycho, Frailty and Girl With The Pearl Earring would have
any chance of being released under the Paramount Classics banner under
Dolgen… and American Psycho would have likely been ruled out
for reasons of its content. And as long as we're talking content restriction,
Paramount Classics could have had a breakout success that dwarfed even
Lions Gate's Miramax pick-up, Fahrenheit 9/11… but the opportunity
to pick-up The Passion of The Christ was nixed by Dolgen, in
spite of P.C.'s strong relationship with Gibson & Davey's Icon Productions.
So of the 15 big
winners that Lions Gate has had, only 3 could have ever found a home
under Paramount Classics Dolgen-era plans.
On the other hand,
Lions Gate has had a run of 19 well-reviewed, high-profile titles that
more closely reflect the level of opportunity that has been given the
heads of Paramount Classics:
The Cooler
- $8.5 million
Shadow of the Vampire - $8.3 million
Rules of Attraction - $6.5 million
Lantana - $4.5 million
Lovely and Amazing - $4.4 million
Secretary - $4 million
The Cat's Meow - $3.3 million
The Big Kahuna - $3.2 million
Shattered Glass - $2.2 million
Dogville - $1.6 million
Wonderland - $1.1 million
Irreversible - $800,000
Max - $600,000
The Grey Zone - $500,000
Inacto - $230,000
Danny Deckchair - $200,000
Mondays In The Sun - $140,000
The Weight of Water - $100,000
A Slipping Down Life - $100,000
How many of these
titles lost money? I'm not sure.
But you'll notice
that Lions Gate has released only three foreign language films. Paramount
Classics has released eight to $400,000 or more, five of them well over
Lions Gate's foreign language high-bar of Irreversible and its
$800,000 domestic gross.
And look at what
Lions Gate has had to work with… Nicole Kidman, Val Kilmer, John
Cusack, Sean Penn, etc, etc. The only movie Paramount Classics has
ever had with a major box office name in it is The Singing Detective
and they were forced to be a bit coy with Mel Gibson's cameo
since his extreme look in the film made him shy about getting too much
exposure for his part. Heck, even Paramount Classics' bad Guy Pearce
movie beat Lions Gate's bad Guy Pearce movie by more than 10%
at the box office.
My point here is
not to bring down Lions Gate to build up Paramount Classics. But while
the lust for "the next Miramax" is understandable, if unachievable,
the perception that Paramount Classics is a lot more than a budget increase
for staff, acquisitions, productions, publicity and marketing away from
being a Lions Gate-level indie is inaccurate.
Paramount was no
more anxious to jump on Fahrenheit 9/11 than Disney or any other
major or major's indie arm was. The idea that Jon Dolgen would
have ever allowed Paramount Classics to invest $33 million in a comic
book movie like The Punisher is patently absurd… and if they
would, it would end up at big Paramount. Classics has never released
a thriller/horror genre picture or an "urban" picture of any
kind. Trekkies, which was the first P.C. release, was a big studio
pick-up and the only doc ever released by the Dependent. As Searchlight,
New Line, Screen Gems, Dimension and now Focus' Rogue have discovered…
these genre pix are often where the greater profits lie… not in quality,
but in good old widened appeal. Paramount Classics has never been allowed
to explore that territory.
None of this is
meant to say that Ruth Vitale and David Dinerstein are
perfect. They aren't. No distributor is. But the "also-ran"
status of the company has been by design, not a reflection of the personal
well of these two veterans. When a guy like Tom Freston takes
over a division, flexing muscles is the norm. But change for the sake
of change seems silly. And a year or two of a Paramount Classics that
is finally allowed to take the chances that Vitale & Dinerstein
have often indicated they would like to be able to take could reap the
kind of success that Freston is looking for.
Keep in mind, Fox
Searchlight's three Oscar-contending titles being released in the next
6 weeks cost over $40 million before P&A. Is that figure two or
three times Paramount Classics' overall annual budget?
Ironically, P.C.
has two really interesting, quality titles on the verge of release right
now. One is the wonderful, smart, edgy and emotional Enduring Love
from director Roger Michell, whose The Mother grossed
less than $1 million for Sony Classics earlier this summer. Michell,
who also directed Paramount's $67 million hit, Changing Lanes,
deserves an aggressive marketing effort from the studio. And Freston
should fund that and give Dinerstein a chance to flex his marketing
muscles.
Then The Machinist,
which I have argued from the start should not be being released before
Batman Begins makes Christian Bale a much bigger star,
could still find a decent audience with the right push.
Unfortunately, time
is short on both these releases. And if you look at the successes of
Miramax and Lions Gate, you'll see long-legged promotion and publicity
efforts that culminate in aggressive spot advertising.
What is the best
way to strengthen a management team at a long ill-funded division like
Paramount Classics? Give them the tools to get their jobs done. There
is a glut of former and want-to-be-former Miramaxers out there. Give
Classics the money to hire a few more experienced bodies. And free them
up to make the bold move. After all, every area of film distribution
is made up of losers, winners and the home runs that move the money
meter into the black.
As my pal Ed used
to say, "Let the players play and they'll party for days."
Tom Freston
can do as he wants. He is the new sheriff in Paramount Town. But before
he throws out the baby or the bathwater, he should know for sure whether
someone peed in the tub or if he's just missing the scent of the bath
oils that Mr. Dolgen made Ms. Vitale return to the store because he
thought they were a luxury his employers shouldn't afford a small division
of their empire.
E-ME:
How would you try to push Paramount Classics into the bigger time?