August
3,
2005
I've
found myself hedging on writing about The Constant Gardner. And
I think the reason is that the movie transcends words.
When City of
God arrived, it was a revelation. Set in the ghetto outside of Rio,
the film wasn't shy about the grim realities of the mean, often unpaved
streets. But it was also as glib and filled with giddiness as the coolest
of Peckinpah or Tarantino films. Fernando Meirelles worked with
children and adult non-actors. He used commercial techniques like freeze
frames, bullet-time and instant replay to tell the story.
It seemed to be
a work of genius from a director making his American debut at 47, mature,
assured, and very, very powerful. But what would come next?
Meirelles was offered
films at virtually every studio in town. He didn't want to make a "Hollywood"
movie, but he did want to work with established actors and he was anxious
to use some of the improvisational techniques that had worked so well
in City of God.
Eventually, he came
upon The Constant Gardener… and I'll have to tell you more about
how that all came together after I see Meirelles and chat with him about
it in a week or two.
The movie…
The Constant
Gardner is two movies. It is a mystery/thriller, set in Kenya. It
is also a powerful love story. And the genius of Meirelles, now confirmed
beyond doubt, is that he blends the two stories, he blends time, he
blends the weight with which we carry our love… our notions of truth….
both our guilt and our sympathy over the poverty and desperations of
others… and the dignity of people we rarely see on film into a artistic
masterpiece. It isn't hard to pull apart all the pieces, but very view
directors have ever had the skill and vision to bring it all together
with such skill.
(As much as I admire
Million Dollar Baby, its simplicity leaves it in black and white
- Meirelles works in unlimited colors.)
Most of the movie
is told in flashback, opening with the death of Tessa Qualyle (Rachel
Weisz). Why was she on the road in the middle of nowhere with a
black driver, not the man that she was traveling with (who is missing).
And is her death anything more than an accident?
Justin Quayle (Ralph
Fiennes) is left to answer these questions for himself. How did
he and Tessa come to this place? Did his wife really love him? Is his
life as a diplomat the sham that Tessa always made him feel it was?
Why did she have secrets from him? And why didn't he ask more questions…
demand more answers? And so, the journey begins.
And Meirelles, the
painter, paints. And every stroke has beauty and meaning. Unlike City
of God, there aren't specific moments that I feel myself pointing
to as "the memorable moments." It is the blending that is
so magical.
Ralph Fiennes
may have delivered his career best work here, in no small part because
it is his most minimalist performance. For him, this is a coming of
age movie.
Rachel Weisz
is pretty amazing here… she is the earth and the truth and the fearlessness…
she is passion… and she is fierce without ever being screechy. As the
film is so much in flashback, our perspective might be a little skewed
by how others see her. But that is the magic of how we see and perceive
others in our lives, no?
Hubert Kounde,
Gerald McSorley, Pete Postlethwaite, Daniel Harford, Richard McCabe
and particularly Donald Sumpter are all wonderful in small roles
in the film. You may recognize half the names on this list, but after
seeing the film, you will remember them all forever.
Danny Huston
gets his best role since Ivansxtc and delivers another cuckold
of sorts, but one who moves like a cat, always saving his own skin.
And Bill Nighy
plays a well-sized cameo in the film as a high government official.
The reason I've broken him out, other than that you can't take your
eyes off of him when he is on screen - any screen - is that on my second
viewing of the film, I started thinking about the plot and found myself
thinking about a film Nighy stars in, now on HBO, called The Girl
in the Café. If it is not a ripoff of this story, the idea
floating in the U.K. air as Meirelles moved forward with this project,
it is close in certain keys ways. Girl in the Café starts
Nighy as a government official who is a few steps from the top, but
is heading to the G8 Summit. He meets a girl in a café, played
by Kelly Macdonald, who he falls for and invites to accompany
him to the G8. But that film, which was pleasant enough, had a tendency
to lecture, which The Constant Gardener never quite does. It
always has a high horse nearby, but every time it gets ready to ride
it, Meirelles shifts the tone.
Of course, adapting
screenwriter Jeffrey Caine deserves a lot of credit for this
film. He (and LeCarre) delivered the blueprint. But Meirelles makes
the leap as a director from what could have been quality house painting
and fine art.
Perhaps it is because
Fernando trusts the audience in a way few directors do these days. Guys
like Jarmusch and Haynes and von Trier and even Clint Eastwood
bring you into their view of the world and you are forced to either
accept the experience or to not. Directors like Ridley Scott and
Spielberg and Zemeckis and even Paul Greengrass are great at
creating a world that is familiar to you and then creating singular
events inside of your reality. Merielles is working somewhere else,
much as Julian Schnabel has, coming to film from the art world,
but at a much higher level.
Even a novelist,
who engages your imagination to connect with his or her words, is still
stuck with too much narrative for the reader to imagine the visions
that Meirelles delivers.
Best of all, most
viewers will not think about it all that much… they will just feel it.
So it works, I think, to all kinds of movie lovers. The thriller works,
the mystery unravels, the love story is devastating. .
With Meirelles working
here and Cronenberg delivering his best film this year and another young
breakthrough director about to deliver his first comic/dramatic masterpiece…
2005 is making a turn towards greatness indeed. Let's all just pray
that the big studio product that aspires to greatness achieves it as
well.
E-ME.