Week
Of July 17, 2006 -Mon
/ Wed / Fri
July
21, 2006
Enough drama this
week to wear me out. I am due in San Diego by noon, so I am on a tight
column leash.
The things that
no one seems to want to write about regarding the Oren Aviv ascension
at Disney - since 95% of what has been written and said by Disney types,
including Oren, has been said already - are:
1) Nina Jacobson
will walk away with millions of dollars to settle her contract. I don't
know exactly how things played out, but it would not be unreasonable
to say that Ms. Jacobson chose the delivery room moment of her ultimate
execution and passed on various other ways of doing this, offered by
Dick Cook.
2) The rise of marketing
is a big story… but the rise of the power of the international departments
at studios, which is not as much in the daily psyche of beat reporters,
is an equally significant story. Just as Oren follows Mark Shmuger
to the throne, Mark Zoradi, previously President of Buena Vista
International, follows Jim Gianopulos and, to some degree, Jeff
Blake to the top of the studio food chain, now in charge of all
marketing and distribution for Disney worldwide (that includes the U.S.)
3) Pixar. It's as
though that purchase had no influence or was not part of the infrastructure
for this occurrence.
4) The number of
films to be released by Buena Vista each year as a result of this "revolutionary"
action has crept up daily from 8 to 10 to 13. Why any studio would need
to release more than one film every 3 weeks (14 a year) is beyond me.
Yes, the Miramax arm is there for another level of movie, but that business
has hit the skids at every studio in town except Searchlight (Paramount
Vantage is spending more than Searchlight or Focus, based on greenlights
to date), so the value of maintaining that business, aside from DVD,
is negligible and surely will be revisited regularly in the years to
come.
The truth of the
matter is that every studio in town, except maybe Fox, would love to
thin out the herd and reconsider major elements of their studio game
plan. It is very hard to make changes incrementally in this business.
It's not even a matter of one exec or another being so much better than
another. When seismic studio events like this occur, choices can be
made, even when the choices involve losing some very high quality talent
that just doesn't move the right way for the studio's future. But even
something like changing a production chief or a head of marketing doesn't
always make that much of a difference because the rest of the folks
who got used to a certain style are still there, fighting change, if
even subconsciously.
The situation at
Paramount, with the infusion of DreamWorks talent, is fairly exceptional.
And it still has people on all sides of it more than a little antsy.
The reason that all the bloodletting is required in this new combined
studio is that Paramount wasn't doing great when the merger happened
and when you make a lot of change when doing poorly, the perception
is that you are desperate, even if the changes make great sense. On
the flip side, when you make change when you are on top, as Disney is
now, it's daring and progressive.
The irony is that
the film business is not run like other businesses, no matter how massive
the conglomerates that own the studios become. The drama is much higher
and the returns are much lower. Lots of people get rich working in this
business, but for the studios and their owners? Not so much.
It is crazy. Why
did it take so long for Disney to "greenlight" (since they
are in partnership with Phil Anchutz, there is no unilateral
greenlight) the sequel to Narnia? Because $745 million simply
wasn't a distinct enough success. The first film was every bit as expensive
as a Harry Potter film or the first Rings, but it didn't do those
numbers. It did a lot and it generated over $500 million in returns
in rentals, DVD sales, etc. But what of the next one doesn't do that
and they spend even more money?
Why will Sony release
the next Bond film in Summer instead of fall for the first time since
1989? Well, Bond had been a mostly summer series. But that 1989 film,
License To Kill, was the first Bond film in fifteen years to
drop under $35 million in domestic gross. Back to Fall, on to Pierce
Brosnan, on to $100 million domestic grosses. But, as Pixar decided
after The Incredibles and Monsters, Inc, the Fall numbers
for franchises, except for Harry Potter, just don't seem as good
as in summer. So even if Casino Royale breaks the domestic record
and kisses $200 million, the hope will be that by opening the summer
in 2008, it could open to more than $80 million and gross more than
$250 million.
That is the new
paradigm… now that they have decided to chase the dollar with pre-sold
product and gotten really good at it, it's time to maximize even more.
Disney, Fox, Paramount, Sony, Universal, Warner Bros. Six studios. 52
weeks. 4 truly crappy weeks or so. 24 summer and holiday weekends that
can support more than one opening. That's 12 movies per studio. Hmmm….
The reason Disney
has "everyone" freaked out is that it is a big picture move
in a small picture industry. But you gotta know… the guys with the money…
all about the big picture.
Have a great weekend.
Be careful with your ticket buying dollars out there.
E
Me.
Week
Of April 3, 2006 - Life In the Bubble - Mon
/ Wed / Fri
Week Of April 10, 2006 - List
Week - Mon / Wed
/ Fri
Week Of April 17, 2006 - Review
Week - Mon / Wed
/ Fri
Week Of April 24, 2006 - Overlooked Week - Mon
/ Wed / Fri
Week Of May
1, 2006 - Mystery Week - Tue
/ Wed / Fri
Week Of May
8, 2006 - How We Watch Week - Mon
/ Wed / Fri
Week
Of May 15, 2006 - Premature Week - Oscar
Mon / Wed / Fri
Week
Of May 22, 2006 - B-13
Mon / Inconvenient Wed
/ Fri
Week
Of May 29, 2006 - Wed
/ Fri
Week
Of June 5, 2006 - 666 Tue
/ Iraq
Doc Wed / Seattle Fri
Week
Of June 12, 2006 - SIFF Mon
/ SIFF
Wed / Fri
Week
Of June 19, 2006 - Cinevegas
Mon/Deliver
Us Wed/Prada Fri
Week
Of June 26, 2006 - Pirates
Mon / Super
Again Wed / Fri
Week
Of July 5, 2006 - Wed
Week
Of July 12, 2006 - M.
Night Mon
| You, Me & Wed | Monster
House Fri