September
26, 2007 - Movies Based On
Movies
October
1, 2007
Attack
Of The Traditional Media Blogs
As we navigate the
fall, there is a new phenomenology in the e-journalism air. After
years of whining and kicking and biting (some of it still going on),
both the Los Angeles Times and Variety are ... copying
the blogs.
It's fascinating
to watch ... big, relatively high budgeted, very smart people squirming
about, recreating things that were attempted in places like Gawker Media
and Movie City News years ago and either embraced or discarded.
But even the things we have embraced often are misunderstood by the
majors, failing to grasp the major difference in the economic realities
of a site this size and their mega-watt expectations.
It's not just MCN.
Some of these lessons go back to roughcut.com, a business owned by TNT
Cable and, by extension, Time-Warner.
1.
Ad Sales People Who Are Used To Selling At A High Price Point Are Not
Going To Be Anxious To Sell Relatively Low Priced Internet Ads.
Yes, MCN innovated
last season with an Oscar ad buying option that included smaller, but
well-read, sites. But we did it without taking a dime from the
sites for brokering the deals. (It helps that we don't have an
ad sales department to pay salaries to and that our entire effort in
that regard was a single offering that had none of the variables that
ad sales at places like Variety handle like a Rubik's Cube every
day.) And we had a realistic idea of how much money studios would
pay for advertising on these sites.
In one case, a site
that had a major ad broker the year before earned more than four times
as much with us ... but that amount was still chicken feed in the world
of the trades. And, of course, had the same site been brokered
by an ad sales company, they would have seen half the income or less.
Variety has
decided to move forward this season by bringing a few people on board,
including Kris Tapley, who was a part of our blog ad
umbrella last season, and to presumably offset expenses by brokering
ads for these folks. I wish them luck. It's not that Kris'
site or any of the others are not valuable ... but as Variety
has already acquired a rep around town this year for being unusually
vampiric already -- and finding more resistance (see # 4) -- they should
find the turf pretty well iced over.
Like the LA Times'
maiden attempt at The Envelope last year, I suspect we will see ads
on these pages ... but as added value to bigger buys, avoiding outright
embarrassment. And so long as the web players being brought in
have a minimum guaranteed, they will be fine, even if it comes out of
Variety's pocket.
2.
Many Site Owners Have A Grotesquely Exaggerated Notion Of What Their
Ad Space Is Worth.
There are many fine
websites out there with, again, many smart people behind them.
But we were turned down by a number of sites for the package last season
... and watched very few ads turn up on those sites through the season,
while we sold out the opportunity.
In looking at this
season, we have considered expanding our secondary package to more sites.
But the reality is that as you discuss various very good sites with
studio execs and consultants is that many of the sites are not on their
radar and thus, not worth a lot of money. At some point, the cost
in time in administering a package overwhelms the value of brokering
a package.
3.
Blogs Are Lightning In A Bottle, Better When Brutal,
And Very Hard To Sell.
I was shocked to
read in LA Observed that the LA Times already has 27 blogs.
Variety has a dozen ... and more on the way.
The lesson that
we have already learned at MCN -- and Gawker Media learned before us
-- is that a successful blog is a very specific, unpredictable thing.
But what we do know is that people have to choose to engage with that
blog every day and that that very few of even the successful ones reach
past small cult status. Moreover, people get bored very easily.
And the more competition in a narrow niche space, the harder to be the
breakout blog.
As we have learned
in the movie biz niche, the best way to find an audience has proved
to be extreme writing with more than a dollop of gossip mongering.
And a big part of that is the "gotta see" phenomenon.
People slow down for car accidents, just as they watch car chases on
local news channels. And the more people who talk about it, the
more that others feel they have to slow down and watch simply to remain
a part of the relevant conversation.
But here is the
rub for Traditional Media blogs ... they can't be LA Times Goes Wild
or Variety Says F*** YOU! sites. Industry advertisers don't
like that. And alternating bites with kisses is not quote enought
to make it work. With due respect to the perceived popularity of Nikki
Finke's blog these days ... you see a blog-specific ad buy
for her page once a month or so. Aside from that, it's all LA
Weekly site ads. (I am sure that Nikki will fight this notion
-- because perception can be reality in this town and no one knows that
better than Nikki -- but just look at the ads.) Buyers know they
are finding a studio and agent audience on that page ... but advertising
there suggests support ... and execs never know into whom or what institution
Nikki will stick her shiv ... and if they are the source, even more
reason to keep their distance.
4.
Quantity Is Not Quality.
When you keep adding
blogs to a community that is established, confusion is often more the
response than embrace. Yes, there will be people who go onto the
blog and post and participate. But again, it's about the number
of people and the passion of participation.
The New York
Times had great fortune last year with David Carr
blogging about the Oscars ... a subject that he treated as Wonderland
to his Alice. And he got lost in the rabbit hole a few times.
But overall, it was a unique treatment by a very smart guy who was willing
to be both abusive and self-deprecating and was a fun read. And
as "The New York Times," there was a unique built-in
audience as well as immediate rapt attention from a web community who
embraced the blog as a symbol of web recognition by The Big Show ...
and appropriately, loved David.
Could the LA Times
mirror that success with an Oscar blog by Claudia Eller
or perhaps Goldstein or Horn? Probably. Especially if those
well-established members of the community were willing to piss off some
friends now and again. But as the paper learned with Tom
O'Neil last year, a person without roots at the paper can be
very dangerous ... and as of this writing, the oft-repeated word at
the paper is that they can't wait for O'Neil's contract to expire so
they can "launch" him. And in his case, they pay both
for his sycophantic nature and his need to prove he is not a suck up
by attacking some. Attacks dogs are fun, but they have a short
shelf life.
Interestingly, The
Envelope (or TheEnvelope.com) is being reconceived with more
web-savvy talent. And really, I wish them well. One of the
first things to come down the pike was a more open attitude towards
the rest of the web.
That brings us back
to Variety, which seems to have had a scorched earth policy about
internet competitors. Complaints of stolen original reporting
without credit to the source have risen dramatically in the last year.
And the trade's willingness to link -- in its many blogs -- to competitive
sites appears to be limited.
Even more fascinating
is what seems to be a cultural divide between Peter Bart
and the web-interested side, led by publisher Charlie Koones.
Bart keeps slamming the web and its growing pains in his columns and
Koones' team keeps on exploring the future, initiating new blogs, hiring
away bloggers from competitors, and embracing ideas like an ad sales
umbrella.
5.
Things Change
The experience of
these things and more, which these two majors don't seem to have taken
notice of, suggests trouble for many of the initiatives at both papers
this year. But nothing is for sure, since the players involved
are all individuals who could rise.
The aforementioned
Ms Finke is a classic example of someone who was established, but often
fired, unable to find a stable home ... and in blogging, however much
I object to her editorial choices, has found her place in the sun.
She was born to being an in-town gossip, slamming and squealing her
way to must-read status in many quarters.
The biggest danger
in both places is overstated expectations. The internet is a niche
business. And being strong in a niche can be a very nice place
to be. But it is not the high-flying world of huge ad sales during
the award season for the trades or major papers through the year.
As you know, those sales are falling off, so all Traditional Media is
scrambling for new revenue sources. And after these experiments,
they will keep scrambling.
What could amuse
us at Movie City News more than The Los Angeles Times,
which just a few short years ago attacked us with misinformation - claiming
falsely we were gouging studios with our screening program on which
there was not only no profit, but which we staffed at our expense -
starting their own awards screening program. We got out of that game
in part because of that unkind and inaccurate attack, but also because
so many others were doing screening series that they became, for the
most part, irrelevant in servicing our community. Good luck with yours,
LAT. From what we hear, you may be the first not to have studios pay
for overhead... and that, we think, is a good precedent.
One answer for Traditional
Media may be a hard look at TMZ, the Time-Warner company that has abused
all of the rules long set by Time-Warner magazines. They will
have to avoid being sued, but it seems that they may have landed at
the exact moment when people became so used to mega-corporations having
so many tentacles that they don't connect, say, People to TMZ
and hold one accountable for the other. Or maybe it's just Pat
Kingsley retiring.
But best of luck
to all.
And if there don't
seem to be many answers in this piece ... what? Are you dumb?
Why would I give away answers that I need for my own business?
We have more experimenting to do, too.
E
ME
Week
Of April 3, 2006 - Life In the Bubble - Mon
/ Wed
/ Fri
Week Of April 10, 2006 - List Week - Mon
/ Wed / Fri
Week Of April 17, 2006 - Review Week - Mon
/ Wed
/ Fri
Week Of April 24, 2006 - Overlooked Week - Mon
/ Wed
/ Fri
Week Of May 1, 2006 - Mystery Week - Tue
/ Wed
/ Fri
Week Of May 8, 2006 - How We Watch Week - Mon
/ Wed
/ Fri
Week Of May 15, 2006 - Premature Week - Oscar
Mon / Wed
/ Fri
Week Of May 22, 2006 - B-13
Mon / Inconvenient
Wed / Fri
Week Of May 29, 2006 - Wed
/ Fri
Week Of June 5, 2006 - 666
Tue / Iraq
Doc Wed / Seattle
Fri
Week Of June 12, 2006 - SIFF
Mon / SIFF
Wed / Fri
Week Of June 19, 2006 - Cinevegas
Mon/Deliver
Us Wed/Prada
Fri
Week Of June 26, 2006 - Pirates
Mon / Super
Again Wed / Fri
Week Of July 5, 2006 - Wed
Week Of July 12, 2006 - M.
Night Mon | You,
Me & Wed | Monster
House Fri
Week Of July 17, 2006 -
8 A Year Mon / Water
Wed / Revamp
Fri
Week Of July 24, 2006 -
Comic-Con Mon / Gossip
Wed / Fri
Week Of July 31, 2006 -
Mel G Mon / Talladega
Wed / Fri
Week Of August 7, 2006 -
Mon / Wed
Week Of August 14, 2006 - No Column Mon / Wed
/ Snakes
Fri
Week Of August 21, 2006 - Snakey
Mon / Anniversary
Wed / Scoundrels
Fri
Week Of August 28, 2006 - Mon
Love / Berloff
Wed / Fri
Week Of September 4, 2006 - Thur
Week Of September 11, 2006 - TIFF
Mon / Bobby
Wed / Fr
Week Of September 18, 2006 - Mon
/ TIFF
1 Wed / TIFF
2 Fri
Week Of September 25, 2006 - Mon
/ Wed
Week Of October 2, 2006 - Atonement Mon / Wed
/ Indie
Fri
Week Of October 9, 2006 - Flags
Mon / Wed
/ Fri
Week Of October 16, 2006 - Mon
/ Epagogix
Wed
Week Of October 23, 2006 - TCIFF
Mon / Wed
/ Catch
A Fri
Week Of October 30, 2006 -
Mon / Wed
/ Fri
Week Of November 6, 2006 -
Mon / Dead
Girl Wed / Fri
Week Of November 13, 2006 -
Bond Mon / Wed / TomKat
Fri
Week Of November 20, 2006 -
Mon / Thankful
Wed
Week Of November 27, 2006 -
Mon / Auteur
Wed / Blood
D Fri
Week Of December 4, 2006 -
Mon / Wed
Week Of December 11, 2006 -
Mon / Wed
Week Of December 18, 2006 -
Mon / Wed
/ COM
Fri
Week Of December 27, 2006 - Wed
/ Worst
of 2006 Fri
Week Of Janiuary 3, 2007 - Best
Of 2006 Wed
Week Of Janiuary 8, 2007 - Mon
/ COM
Book Wed
Week Of January 17, 2007 - Little
Red Writing Hood Wed
Week Of January 29, 2007 - Mon
Week Of February 5, 2007 -This Thing We Do Wk - Mon
/ Wed
/ Fri
Week Of February 12, 2007 - Mon
/ Wed
/ Fri
Week Of February 26, 2007 - Rough
Oscars Mon / Zodiac
Wed / Doc
& Foreign Fri
Week Of March 5, 2007 - Mon
/ Fri
March 14 /
March 21/ March
28
Week Of April 4, 2007 - Wed
/ Grindhouse
Fri
Week
Of April 9, 2007 - Indie
Distirbution Mon / Star
Ranking Wed / Top
20 Fri
Week
Of April 16, 2007 - Mon
/ Piaf
Wed
Week
Of April 23, 2007 - Mon
/ Tribeca
Wed / Costner
Fri
Week
Of April 30, 2007 - Spider
Mon
Week
Of May 7, 2007 -
Mon / Wed
/ Fri
Week
Of May 14, 2007 - 10
Thing Studios Don't Want Wed / Fri
Week
Of May 21, 2007 - Mon
/ Pirates
Fri
Week
Of May 28, 2007 - Knocked
Up Friday
Week
Of June 4, 2007 - Hostel
2 Mon / Ocean's
Wed / Seattle
Fri
Week
Of June 11, 2007 - Sopranos
Mon
Week
Of June 18, 2007 - Mon
/ Sicko
Wed
Week
Of July 2, 2007 - Xanadu
Fri
Week
Of July 9, 2007 - Mon
/ Hairspray
Fri
Week
Of July 23, 2007 - Bourne
Mon / Superbad
Wed
Week
Of July 30, 2007 - Shoot
Em Up Mon /
Fri
Week
Of August 6, 2007 - Wed
/ New
Line Fri
Week
Of August 13, 2007 -
Macho
Fri
Week
Of August 20, 2007 - Mon
/ 10
Year Wed /
Fri
Week
Of August 27, 2007 - Young Frankenstein - Mon
/ Wed
September
5, 2007 - The
Little Mermaid
September
19, 2007 - Who Censors The
Censors?