


|
 |
 |
As promised, this weekend’s edition of Civilian
Voices will focus on the recent release of Adam Sandler’s
Little Nicky. It may seem strange to think that a $15 million
opening equals failure, but with Sandler’s recent track record
at the box office, $15 million is very disappointing. Wilbert
explains succinctly why the film failed to find an opening-weekend
audience...
|
"I’d like to think
it’s the beginning of the end for Adam Sandler, but it
isn’t. His films have never had to compete. Guys would much
rather see three scantily clad babes than Sandler’s stupid son
of Satan."
-- Wilbert
|
Wilbert
does not seem to be much of an Adam Sandler fan. Even less of
a fan is fellow roughcut.com reader Drew. (I’m going to
venture a guess the last name isn’t Barrymore.) Reader Drew doesn’t
mince words in his assessment of Mr. Sandler’s brand of comedy...
"Little Nicky
finished in second place under $20 million? I could not be happier!
It’s about time that the movie-going public finally woke up
and realized that Adam Sandler is the most overrated,
overpaid, SNL yutz since... well... Chris Farley.
"I tried once to sit
through an Adam Sandler film years ago: Happy Gilmore.
I could not take more than twenty minutes. I think it would
have even offended a pea brain! I tried this after seeing him
in other films where he did not have the lead role, such as
Airheads, which pretty much describes the crowd that
can sit and laugh at this dreck.
Do I believe Sandler can
be a serious actor? No.
"Not even Scorsese
with a bullwhip can bring any sort of substance to Sandler.
Go back to the SNL crew every year for the reunion, Adam!
That noise you’re hearing is the crash of your film career!"
-- Drew
|
Ouch. That’s
gonna leave a mark. I really have to disagree with Drew on one point.
Chris Farley = funny. I will go to my grave defending Tommy
Boy as a great comedy. Ridiculously stupid, but funny. Come on,
Drew. Just the "fat guy in a little coat" bit was enough for
me. Moving on... Unlike the previous two readers, Paul D. enjoys
the comedy of Adam Sandler. But is he a fan of the actor’s latest
flick? Read on...
"I was pleased to see
how poorly Little Nicky did at the box office over the
weekend. Adam Sandler got exactly what he deserved. I’ll
admit that I am a big fan of Sandler and his movies. I think
Billy Madison, Happy Gilmore and The Waterboy
are modern comedy masterpieces, and they remain funny every
time I watch them. But Sandler and company went too far with
Little Nicky. Why in the hell does a Sandler movie need
special effects? Variety reported that the movie cost
$80 million! That is insane! I mean, this is Adam Sandler
we are talking about. The effects helped ruin Little Nicky,
which is Sandler’s worst movie by far. Even though the insane
Roger Ebert called it his best. (And he gave Red Planet
three stars. Does anyone think he knows what he’s doing anymore?)
Sandler’s lisp and hunchback routine got old after about 10
seconds, and his doofus charm was nowhere to be found. I hope
he learns his lesson here and returns to form soon."
-- Paul Doro
|
Also weighing
in on Mr. Sandler and his movies is Civilian Voices regular Li
Wright...
"I have only seen Sandler
one time, in The Wedding Singer, and while he has a comic
charm, I cannot see him in every single movie he releases because
he acts the same. He’s not a versatile comic actor like Eddie
Murphy, who can go from street tough to soft, or Steve
Martin, or even Jim Carrey (although I’m getting
a bit tired of him, also, and he’s probably getting tired of
himself). In other words, Sandler doesn’t have stretch. Sandler
is the little boy who won’t grow up, but he must. He must try
to do a Bill Murray and take chances in small dramatic
or comic roles.
"He’s not the first
or the last comic to be trapped in his persona: look at Bob
Hope, The Marx Brothers, and on and on. However,
they had the good sense to take their personas and shtick to
television. There are endless comics who did the same-o stuff
and eventually had to disappear and regroup or retool their
image.
"I think we’re going
to see Jim Carrey very shortly take a hiatus and come
back as a dramatic actor or supporting actor. How much longer
can he do his physical comedy?"
-- Li Wright
|
Amy
M.
thinks Adam’s future is still bright, but cautions the actor to choose
better roles...
"I’ll take, ‘Tell me
if you think the lackluster box office of Little Nicky
is the beginning of the end for Adam Sandler’ for 100,
please, Meghan.’ To get right to the question: no, I don’t think
it has to be the beginning of the end for Mr. Sandler. However,
it is an indication that, if his goal is to be a continuing
box-office success (and not merely to test the limits of his
silliness quotient while employing as many of his friends as
possible), he is going to have to be a little bit more choosy
in the project-picking department.
"Yes, I do think audiences
will be a little more cautious before they run out and see a
movie just because Adam Sandler’s name is attached to
it. But I also think that, if his next film is a good one, people
will flock to it in droves, because he does have what the French
would call a certain ‘I don’t know what.’
"That said, I think
it would behoove young Adam to put some effort into defining
his ‘Je ne sais quoi.’ I believe the key to his appeal
(and this is true of many actors/onscreen personalities) lies
in his vulnerability. The character has got to possess some
degree of social consciousness -- that ‘I really want this girl
to like me’ thing. There’s going up to the line, and then there’s
going over it. When Adam Sandler goes over the line and
really becomes a nerd -- and nerds want to hang out with pretty
girls, but it really doesn’t enter their minds that they might
want to change their behavior to make themselves more appealing
-- that is where the trouble starts. This Nicky movie
just looks nasty...the hapless-nice-guy shtick that Sandler
had going in The Wedding Singer and Big Daddy
is gone. He is simply too weird. I, for one, refuse to see this
movie and indulge that grotesque sort of weirdness. Give me
something that goes up to the edge -- even if it’s a distant
edge, and stays there -- and my butt will be firmly planted
in a cinematic seat enjoying the ride."
-- Amy Miller of
the South Carolina Millers
|
Next up is
Isaac B., who hasn’t lost faith in the power of the lowest common
denominator...
"So Sandler came out
with another movie. I’d love to tell you what I thought about
it, but after I saw The Waterboy in theaters, I made
a personal vow never to pay to see one of his films again, a
promise that’s been incredibly easy to keep. Besides, if you’ve
seen one Sandler flick, you’ve seen them all. Here, I’ll prove
it: in which movie does Adam play an annoying man-child prone
to violent screaming fits whose life is going nowhere, when
suddenly something so preposterous occurs that it forces him
to grow up and defeat a bad guy more two-dimensional than a
Batman villain? Oh yeah, and he gets the girl, too.
"Whatever your answer,
you win.
"This weekend, Little
Nicky came in second at the box office. Do I think this
is the end of Adam Sandler? Absolutely not. Nothing succeeds
in film like the lowest common denominator and, next to a Bruckheimer
production, you truly can’t get any lower than his scripts.
(Does he even write second drafts? Seriously, I’d love to know.)
"Of course, all this
could change. Supposedly, both Quentin Tarantino
and P. T. Anderson are interested in using him in their
upcoming movies. It sounded strange at first, but then I sort
of understand the appeal. As bad as his movies are, Sandler
himself has always appeared to be a very likable, down-to-earth
guy (another reason he’s so popular), and for that reason, I
could see both directors wanting to work with him. Some might
argue that all they’re really interested in is getting to his
fan base and the money that comes with it, but both already
have a loyal following. Even if Magnolia wasn’t a box-office
success, it certainly hasn’t killed Anderson’s career. (I saw
it in theaters and really liked it.)
"As for the film that
beat Little Nicky, I’m waiting for video to see Charlie’s
Angels. I like Diaz, but I can’t imagine there’s anything
in the film that demands full-price admission, and besides,
what better way to watch an updated jiggle-fest than with a
freeze frame and slo-mo button?"
-- Isaac B
|
And finally,
here is Ian with his take on the weak opening box office of Little
Nicky. Plus his picks for film of the year...
"To say that Little
Nicky could herald the end of Adam Sandler’s career
is ridiculous. After all, it ‘only’ opened with $15 million
in a competitive box-office environment. The luster may have
gone from Sandler, but if Nicky goes on to gross about
$70 million, then it will not be a massive loss. What should
worry Sandler is the slightly iffy performance of a film that
should have been a slam dunk. After all, Jim Carrey’s
first disappointment, The Cable Guy, came form trying
something new and different with his persona. Maybe Sandler
will use his undeniable ability to tap into the 12- to 22-year-old
male demographic to craft something a little bit smarter next
time.
"As for the top films
of the year, I am still leaning toward Erin Brockovich.
The problem with living in Ireland is that we will not get Crouching
Tiger, Hidden Dragon, Almost Famous, You Can Count
on Me, and most other critically lauded films until January
or February. The most outrageously enjoyable film of the year
for me was What Lies Beneath, but Brockovich affected
me, and both Roberts and Finney were sublime."
-- Ian
|
Is there anyone
out there who would like to defend Little Nicky and/or Adam
Sandler? I feel a little guilty that today’s column contained so
much Adam-bashing -- he seems like a really nice guy -- but those were
the e-mails I received on the subject. If you’re an Adam fan who would
like to respond to the above comments, be sure to send me an e-mail.
One of my goals is to keep things balanced and fair around here.
This weekend
should be pretty interesting. You’ve got a couple of big stars hoping
to dethrone those Angels. Adam couldn’t do it, but what about Jim or
Arnold? Anyone out there have plans to see The 6th Day or The
Grinch? If you do, be sure to send me your review for Tuesday’s
edition. Let others know if these films are worthwhile.
Thanks again
for all the e-mails. Keep ’em coming, won’t ya?
|