"Unbreakable
was a great postmodern take on the comic-book genre. Its deliberate
pacing, muted colors, and lack of flashy spectacle all worked
together to create the ultimate anticomic. In many ways, I think
that X-Men (a solid film in its own right) would be the
perfect companion piece to this film. However, there were a
few elements of Unbreakable that I found a little distracting.
For instance, I still don’t understand why the filmmakers did
not use real comic books. I do understand that there would have
been an additional cost, but when you spend $5 million for a
script, I think you can afford a few thousand for licensing
a couple of comic titles. It would have been so much more effective
to have Sam Jackson talking about Superman and Spiderman
instead of the made-up characters of the film. It was a little
detail that took away from the ‘authenticity’ of comics as contemporary
mythology.
"The opening
and closing title cards have got to go. Just because you tell
us that there are lots of people who read comic books doesn’t
mean that the audience will accept those readers as authorities.
Our first image of the comic collector is that guy from The
Simpsons (which needs to do a parody for next year’s Halloween
special) who still lives in his parents’ basement. The director
needed to trust the actors to make the case for comic books
through the course of the film rather than spoon-feeding us
a couple of facts to chew on.
"And finally,
the closing sequence -- the closing title cards reduced the
film to an episode of Dragnet or Law and Order.
Please Mr. Director (I don’t know how to spell your name), if
you read this, give those of us with a DVD player the option
of watching this film without end blurbs. It would be one of
the easiest and most effective cuts made from any film."
-- J. Frank